Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623673›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Its 3D-Printed Quantitate Assessment in Cranial Reconstruction.

Khaja Moiduddin, Syed Hammad Mian, Sherif Mohammed Elseufy, Hisham Alkhalefah, Sundar Ramalingam, Abdul Sayeed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khaja MoiduddinAdvanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5017-0310
Syed Hammad MianAdvanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9780-0842
Sherif Mohammed ElseufyAdvanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-0837
Hisham AlkhalefahAdvanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-2534
Sundar RamalingamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry and Dental University Hospital, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2343-5379
Abdul SayeedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-3565
King Saud University · SA

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, "Ministry of Education" in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFK-SUDR_H108) Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing, medical imaging, and implant design have all advanced significantly in recent years, and these developments may change how modern craniomaxillofacial surgeons use patient data to create tailored treatments. Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is often seen as an attractive option over metal biomaterials in medical uses, but a solid PEEK implant often leads to poor osseointegration and clinical failure. Therefore, the objective of this study is to demonstrate the quantitative assessment of a custom porous PEEK implant for cranial reconstruction and to evaluate its fitting accuracy. The research proposes an efficient process for designing, fabricating, simulating, and inspecting a customized porous PEEK implant. In this study, a CT scan is utilized in conjunction with a mirrored reconstruction technique to produce a skull implant. In order to foster cell proliferation, the implant is modified into a porous structure. The implant's strength and stability are examined using finite element analysis. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is utilized to fabricate the porous PEEK implants, and 3D scanning is used to test its fitting accuracy. The results of the biomechanical analysis indicate that the highest stress observed was approximately 61.92 MPa, which is comparatively low when compared with the yield strength and tensile strength of the material. The implant fitting analysis demonstrates that the implant's variance from the normal skull is less than 0.4436 mm, which is rather low given the delicate anatomy of the area. The results of the study demonstrate the implant's endurance while also increasing the patient's cosmetic value.

Indexed as

3D printingbiomechanical analysiscranial defectsfitting analysispolyether-ether-ketoneporous implants

Identifiers

PMID37623673
PMCPMC10455463
OpenAlexW4385994625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.