Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623659›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023

Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Chitosan/Polylactic Acid (CH/PLA) Nanofiber Scaffolds for Biomedical Application.

Yevhen Samokhin, Yuliia Varava, Kateryna Diedkova, Ilya Yanko, Yevheniia Husak, Julia Radwan-Pragłowska, Oksana Pogorielova, Łukasz Janus, Maksym Pogorielov, Viktoriia Korniienko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrospun PLA/chitosan/PEG nanofibers for controlled delivery of ethylFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yevhen SamokhinBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Yuliia VaravaBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-1007-3743
Kateryna DiedkovaBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Ilya YankoBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Yevheniia HusakBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Julia Radwan-PragłowskaFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.
Oksana PogorielovaBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Łukasz JanusFaculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.
Maksym PogorielovBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-7791
Viktoriia KorniienkoBiomedical Research Centre, Sumy State University, R-Korsakova Street, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine.
Sumy State University · UACracow University of Technology · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

European Commission 101086441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study demonstrates a strategy for preparing porous composite fibrous materials with superior biocompatibility and antibacterial performance. The findings reveal that the incorporation of PEG into the spinning solutions significantly influences the fiber diameters, morphology, and porous area fraction. The addition of a hydrophilic homopolymer, PEG, into the Ch/PLA spinning solution enhances the hydrophilicity of the resulting materials. The hybrid fibrous materials, comprising Ch modified with PLA and PEG as a co-solvent, along with post-treatment to improve water stability, exhibit a slower rate of degradation (stable, moderate weight loss over 16 weeks) and reduced hydrophobicity (lower contact angle, reaching 21.95 ± 2.17°), rendering them promising for biomedical applications. The antibacterial activity of the membranes is evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, with PEG-containing samples showing a twofold increase in bacterial reduction rate. In vitro cell culture studies demonstrated that PEG-containing materials promote uniform cell attachment, comparable to PEG-free nanofibers. The comprehensive evaluation of these novel materials, which exhibit improved physical, chemical, and biological properties, highlights their potential for biomedical applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

antibacterial biomaterialsbiocompatibilitychitosanelectrospinningnanofiberspolylactic acid

Identifiers

PMID37623659
PMCPMC10455531
OpenAlexW4385603074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.