Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623269›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2023

The Impact of the Test Dissociation on the Binocular Balance of Children.

Danjela Ibrahimi, Marcos Aviles, Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndiz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Additional accommodative controls in near heterophoria targets do not improve accommodative responses in young adults.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danjela IbrahimiFaculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5103-082X
Marcos AvilesFaculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2838-4854
Juvenal Rodríguez-ReséndizFaculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Querétaro, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-5600
Autonomous University of Queretaro · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposethis research compared the dissociated phoria at near and distance fixation in free space using the Howell test, alternate Cover test, and Thorington test.

methods220 healthy Mexican children (mean age 8.3±2.5 years) participated in this study. Phorias were quantified at both distances using each test, from the least to the most disruptive. The stereopsis degree and near point of convergence (break/recovery) were analyzed to understand their role in the visual system's sensorimotor balance.

resultsstatistically significant differences were found among techniques, with a higher congruence for the EF. However, only the Howell and Thorington tests can be interchanged. The break value and near exophoria relate to each other and affect the stereopsis degree, whereas age is associated with the stereopsis degree and break value.

conclusionsthe three techniques cannot be interchanged except for the Howell and Thorington test for the EF at far. The differences in the mode of dissociation could relate to the results.

Indexed as

alternate Cover testbreak value of near point of convergencedegree of stereopsisdissociated phoria stateHowell testThorington test

Identifiers

PMID37623269
PMCPMC10453251
OpenAlexW4385986837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.