Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623184›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Feasibility of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire among Women in Danish Antenatal Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Helle Johnsen, Mette Juhl, Eva Rydahl, Sara Mbaye Karentius, Sabine Marie Rath, Majbritt Friis-Alstrup, Mette Grønbæk Backhausen, Katrine Røhder, Michaela Louise Schiøtz, Lotte Broberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helle JohnsenDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette JuhlDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva RydahlDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6272-0466
Sara Mbaye KarentiusDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabine Marie RathDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300 Holbæk, Denmark.
Majbritt Friis-AlstrupDepartment of Obstetrics, Slagelse Hospital, Fælledvej 13, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.
Mette Grønbæk BackhausenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Katrine RøhderDepartment of Psychology, Copenhagen University, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-1585
Michaela Louise SchiøtzCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Lotte BrobergCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-7941
Vibeke de LichtenbergDepartment of Midwifery and Therapeutic Sciences, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A traumatic upbringing increases the risks of antenatal health problems, unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, and mental disorders. Such childhood experiences may affect women's pa-renting skills and the social-emotional functioning of their children. Research on screening for adverse childhood experiences in antenatal care is limited. The objective of this study was to explore pregnant women's attitudes towards and experiences of an adverse childhood experiences questionnaire, and to assess the relevance of the questionnaire among a population of pregnant women referred to antenatal care levels one and two, targeting women who are generally not perceived to be vulnerable. Data were collected at three maternity wards and consisted of quantitative data on 1352 women's adverse childhood experience scores, structured observations of 18 midwifery visits, and in-depth interviews with 15 pregnant women. Quantitative data were analysed by descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analysed using systematic text condensation. The qualitative analysis revealed two main categories: "Being screened for childhood adversities" and "Having adverse childhood experiences". In the study population, the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences was high. The women assessed the adverse childhood experiences questionnaire to be a relevant and acceptable screening method. Furthermore, women's perceptions of their relationship with their midwife greatly impacted their attitudes towards and experiences of the questionnaire.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesChildData AccuracyDenmarkFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Careadverse childhood experiencesantenatal carepregnancyscreening

Identifiers

PMID37623184
PMCPMC10454047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.