Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623151›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Consensus Panel Recommendations for the Pharmacological Management of Pregnant Women with Depressive Disorders.

Georgios Eleftheriou, Riccardo Zandonella Callegher, Raffaella Butera, Marco De Santis, Anna Franca Cavaliere, Sarah Vecchio, Alessandra Pistelli, Giovanna Mangili, Emi Bondi, Lorenzo Somaini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Georgios EleftheriouItalian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0662-866X
Riccardo Zandonella CallegherItalian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-5193-6909
Raffaella ButeraItalian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy.
Marco De SantisItalian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIGO), via di Porta Pinciana 6, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Anna Franca CavaliereItalian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIGO), via di Porta Pinciana 6, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Sarah VecchioItalian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy.
Alessandra PistelliItalian Society of Toxicology (SITOX), via Giovanni Pascoli 3, 20129 Milan, Italy.
Giovanna MangiliItalian Society of Neonatology (SIN), Corso Venezia 8, 20121 Milan, Italy.
Emi BondiItalian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-7886
Lorenzo SomainiSer.D Biella-Drug Addiction Service, 13875 Biella, Italy.
Mariapina GalloPoison Control Center, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Matteo BalestrieriPsychiatry Unit, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Umberto AlbertItalian Society of Psychiatry (SIP), piazza Santa Maria della Pietà 5, 00135 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-4219
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Udine · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITItalian Society of Physiotherapy · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe initiative of a consensus on the topic of antidepressant and anxiolytic drug use in pregnancy is developing in an area of clinical uncertainty. Although many studies have been published in recent years, there is still a paucity of authoritative evidence-based indications useful for guiding the prescription of these drugs during pregnancy, and the data from the literature are complex and require expert judgment to draw clear conclusions.

methodsFor the elaboration of the consensus, we have involved the scientific societies of the sector, namely, the Italian Society of Toxicology, the Italian Society of Neuropsychopharmacology, the Italian Society of Psychiatry, the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Italian Society of Drug Addiction and the Italian Society of Addiction Pathology. An interdisciplinary team of experts from different medical specialties (toxicologists, pharmacologists, psychiatrists, gynecologists, neonatologists) was first established to identify the needs underlying the consensus. The team, in its definitive structure, includes all the representatives of the aforementioned scientific societies; the task of the team was the evaluation of the most accredited international literature as well as using the methodology of the "Nominal Group Technique" with the help of a systematic review of the literature and with various discussion meetings, to arrive at the drafting and final approval of the document.

resultsThe following five areas of investigation were identified: (1) The importance of management of anxiety and depressive disorders in pregnancy, identifying the risks associated with untreated maternal depression in pregnancy. (2) The assessment of the overall risk of malformations with the antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs used in pregnancy. (3) The evaluation of neonatal adaptation disorders in the offspring of pregnant antidepressant/anxiolytic-treated women. (4) The long-term outcome of infants' cognitive development or behavior after in utero exposure to antidepressant/anxiolytic medicines. (5) The evaluation of pharmacological treatment of opioid-abusing pregnant women with depressive disorders.

conclusionsConsidering the state of the art, it is therefore necessary in the first instance to frame the issue of pharmacological choices in pregnant women who need treatment with antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs on the basis of data currently available in the literature. Particular attention must be paid to the evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio, understood both in terms of therapeutic benefit with respect to the potential risks of the treatment on the pregnancy and on the fetal outcome, and of the comparative risk between the treatment and the absence of treatment; in the choice prescription, the specialist needs to be aware of both the potential risks of pharmacological treatment and the equally important risks of an untreated or undertreated disorder.

Indexed as

Anti-Anxiety AgentsDepressive DisorderPsychiatryClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeopleUncertaintyAnti-Anxiety Agentsantidepressantsanxiolytic drugsconsensuspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37623151
PMCPMC10454549
OpenAlexW4385759437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.