Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37623011›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Cancer-Related Pain Management in Suitable Intrathecal Therapy Candidates: A Spanish Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus.

Concha Pérez, Teresa Quintanar, Carmen García, Miguel Ángel Cuervo, María Jesús Goberna, Manuela Monleón, Ana I González, Luís Lizán, Marta Comellas, María Álvarez and 1 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multidisciplinary management of persistent severe cancer pain: a collaborative European approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Concha PérezHospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-8936
Teresa QuintanarHospital General Universitario de Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5259-9447
Carmen GarcíaUnidad de Continuidad Asistencial, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel CuervoHospital Universitario de Badajoz, 06080 Badejoz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8613-7072
María Jesús GobernaComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain.
Manuela MonleónEquipo de Soporte de Atención Domiciliaria de Legazpi, 28045 Madrid, Spain.
Ana I GonzálezAsociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), 28045 Madrid, Spain.
Luís LizánOutcomes'10, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-2454
Marta ComellasOutcomes'10, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-9882
María ÁlvarezHealth Economics & Outcomes Research Unit, Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., 28050 Madrid, Spain.
Isaac PeñaHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus is needed among healthcare professionals involved in easing oncological pain in patients who are suitable candidates for intrathecal therapy. A Delphi consultation was conducted, guided by a multidisciplinary scientific committee. The 18-item study questionnaire was designed based on a literature review together with a discussion group. The first-round questionnaire assessed experts' opinion of the current general practice, as well as their recommendation and treatment feasibility in the near future (2-3-year period) using a 9-point Likert scale. Items for which consensus was not achieved were included in a second round. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (1-3 or 7-9). A total of 67 panelists (response rate: 63.2%) and 62 (92.5%) answered the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. The participants were healthcare professionals from multiple medical disciplines who had an average of 17.6 (7.8) years of professional experience. A consensus was achieved on the recommendations (100%). The actions considered feasible to implement in the short term included effective multidisciplinary coordination, improvement in communication among the parties, and an assessment of patient satisfaction. Efforts should focus on overcoming the barriers identified, eventually leading to the provision of more comprehensive care and consideration of the patient's perspective.

Indexed as

Cancer PainNeoplasmsCommunicationConsensusHumansPain ManagementcancerconsensusDelphi techniqueintrathecalpain

Identifiers

PMID37623011
PMCPMC10453610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.