Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622957›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Power Benefits of High-Altitude Flapping Wing Flight at the Monarch Butterfly Scale.

Chang-Kwon Kang, Madhu Sridhar, Rachel Twigg, Jeremy Pohly, Taeyoung Lee, Hikaru Aono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chang-Kwon KangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9353-4519
Madhu SridharDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-3057
Rachel TwiggDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.
Jeremy PohlyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9869-3014
Taeyoung LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-4150
Hikaru AonoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Shinshu University, Ueda 386-8567, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-0833

Funding

National Science Foundation CMMI-1761618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-range migration of monarch butterflies, extended over 4000 km, is not well understood. Monarchs experience varying density conditions during migration, ranging as high as 3000 m, where the air density is much lower than at sea level. In this study, we test the hypothesis that the aerodynamic performance of monarchs improves at reduced density conditions by considering the fluid-structure interaction of chordwise flexible wings. A well-validated, fully coupled Navier-Stokes/structural dynamics solver was used to illustrate the interplay between wing motion, aerodynamics, and structural flexibility in forward flight. The wing density and elastic modulus were measured from real monarch wings and prescribed as inputs to the aeroelastic framework. Our results show that sufficient lift is generated to offset the butterfly weight at higher altitudes, aided by the wake-capture mechanism, which is a nonlinear wing-wake interaction mechanism, commonly seen for hovering animals. The mean total power, defined as the sum of the aerodynamic and inertial power, decreased by 36% from the sea level to the condition at 3000 m. Decreasing power with altitude, while maintaining the same equilibrium lift, suggests that the butterflies generate lift more efficiently at higher altitudes.

Indexed as

butterfly flightflexible wingshigh altitude

Identifiers

PMID37622957
PMCPMC10452477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.