Grasping Performance Analysis and Comparison of Multi-Chamber Ring-Shaped Soft Grippers.

Biologically inspired pneumatic ring-shaped soft grippers have been extensively studied in the field of soft robotics. However, the effect of the number of air chambers on the grasping performance (grasping range and load capacity) of ring-shaped soft grippers has not been studied. In this article, we propose three ring-shaped soft grippers with the same area of inner walls of air chambers and different numbers of air chambers (two-chamber, three-chamber, and four-chamber) for analyzing and comparing their grasping performance. Finite element method (FEM) models and experimental measurements are conducted to compare the deformation of the inner walls of the three ring-shaped soft grippers, the results indicate that the grasping range of the three-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper is larger than that of the two-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper and the four-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper. Then we choose the three-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper to study the relationship between contact force and air pressure by FEM models and experimental measurements. Several groups of experiments are constructed to compare the load capacity of the three ring-shaped soft grippers, the results indicate that the load capacity of the three-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper is higher than that of the two-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper and the four-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper. The above results reveal that the grasping performance of the three-chamber ring-shaped soft gripper is better than that of other two ring-shaped soft grippers. Furthermore, the application experiments indicate that the three ring-shaped soft grippers can grasp various objects with different weights, material properties, and shapes. This study provides a new idea for investigating ring-shaped soft grippers.