ArticleBiosensors2023
WSCNet: Biomedical Image Recognition for Cell Encapsulated Microfluidic Droplets.
Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Microfluidic Chip Enabling Preparation and Immobilization of Cell-Laden Microspheres, and Microsphere-Based Cell Culture and Analysis.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Microfluidic point-of-care testing for antimicrobial resistance: advances, strategies, and One Health perspectives.Science in One Health · 2026Review
- Small Object Localization with 90% Annotation Reduction by Positive-Unlabeled Learning.Micromachines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic droplets accommodating a single cell as independent microreactors are frequently demanded for single-cell analysis of phenotype and genotype. However, challenges exist in identifying and reducing the covalence probability (following Poisson's distribution) of more than two cells encapsulated in one droplet. It is of great significance to monitor and control the quantity of encapsulated content inside each droplet. We demonstrated a microfluidic system embedded with a weakly supervised cell counting network (WSCNet) to generate microfluidic droplets, evaluate their quality, and further recognize the locations of encapsulated cells. Here, we systematically verified our approach using encapsulated droplets from three different microfluidic structures. Quantitative experimental results showed that our approach can not only distinguish droplet encapsulations (F1 score > 0.88) but also locate each cell without any supervised location information (accuracy > 89%). The probability of a "single cell in one droplet" encapsulation is systematically verified under different parameters, which shows good agreement with the distribution of the passive method (Residual Sum of Squares, RSS < 0.5). This study offers a comprehensive platform for the quantitative assessment of encapsulated microfluidic droplets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.