Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622720›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2023

The association of cervical cancer screening and quality of care: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Minmin Wang, Yinzi Jin, Zhi-Jie Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minmin WangDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yinzi JinDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Jie ZhengDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of care is vital to enhance outcomes for cervical cancer patients. However, the inequality of cervical cancer care was seldomly assessed. Methods: We collected the data of cervical cancer burden from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 database, and constructed the Quality of Care Index (QCI) using principle component analysis. Then the disparity of QCI across regions and populations were evaluated. The association between cervical cancer screening coverage and QCI weas also explored. Results: Quality of cervical cancer care was of disparity across regions with different development levels, with a widening gap between low-income regions and others. Cervical cancer QCI dropped rapidly after the age of 35. Cervical cancer screening coverage was positively associated with QCI, and this association was stronger in countries with low- and middle-development levels. Conclusions: Regions with a low development level and the middle-aged women were vulnerable in QCI improvement. Higher screening coverage was associated with better cervical cancer QCI, implying that expanding cervical cancer screening coverage may be an effective strategy to improve the quality of cervical cancer care.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedPovertyQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37622720
PMCPMC10451102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.