Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622485›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2024

Travelling overseas for proton beam therapy: A retrospective interview study.

Kelly Skelton, Peter Gorayski, Hui Tee, Nigel Anderson, Hien Le

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics of Crowdfunding Campaigns for Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly SkeltonAustralian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2571-2042
Peter GorayskiAustralian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Hui TeeAustralian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nigel AndersonUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hien LeAustralian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTravelling for cancer treatment comes with unique challenges, particularly for a young patient and his or her family. The aims of this study were to (1) gain an understanding of the experiences of families and patients who travelled overseas (OS) from Australia for proton beam therapy (PBT) and (2) identify the supportive care needs patients and their families require when living away from home, while having PBT.

methodsThis was a retrospective, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, conducted with participants aged under 25 years and their families who travelled OS for PBT between 2017 and 2020. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel Software, where key themes were identified and coded based on their responses. A total of 17 participants were included in interviews from seven Australian families who travelled to America or Europe for PBT.

resultsThe majority of participants reported a lack of coordination with travel and treatment arrangements prior to arrival OS. Families who stayed in hotel accommodation while OS reported greater feelings of isolation compared with those who stayed in share house-style accommodation. The acuity of cancer diagnosis played a significant part in patient experience, with those patients requiring the greatest amount of supportive care and availability of service provision at stand-alone centres reporting a lack of appropriate care provision.

conclusionsThis study has identified services, accommodation provisions and care coordination requirements that are largely missing from the travel and treatment experience in patients travelling OS for PBT. Future use of consumer-led working groups or committees in creating models of care for families travelling for PBT treatment could be advantageous, with many families willing to share their experiences and provide support to others who are travelling for PBT.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesTravelOncologyproton therapyradiationradiotherapytravelling for cancer treatment

Identifiers

PMID37622485
PMCPMC11011578
OpenAlexW4386152327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.