Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622379›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2023

AI-dente: an open machine learning based tool to interpret nano-indentation data of soft tissues and materials.

Patrick Giolando, Sotirios Kakaletsis, Xuesong Zhang, Johannes Weickenmeier, Edward Castillo, Berkin Dortdivanlioglu, Manuel K Rausch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick GiolandoThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, USA.
Sotirios KakaletsisThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, USA.
Xuesong ZhangStevens Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, USA.
Johannes WeickenmeierStevens Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, USA.
Edward CastilloThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, USA.
Berkin DortdivanliogluThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, USA. berkin@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7105-1452
Manuel K RauschThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-6472

Funding

Using an Electrospun Surrogate Model to Investigate Mechanisms of Tricuspid Valve MaladaptationR01HL165251 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MANUEL Karl RAUSCH · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
Human-Specific Prediction, Training, and Visualization Tools for the Tricuspid Valve from Existing DataR21HL161832 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI RAUSCH, MANUEL KARL · 2022 to 2023
$222k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL165251NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL161832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano-indentation is a promising method to identify the constitutive parameters of soft materials, including soft tissues. Especially when materials are very small and heterogeneous, nano-indentation allows mechanical interrogation where traditional methods may fail. However, because nano-indentation does not yield a homogeneous deformation field, interpreting the resulting load-displacement curves is non-trivial and most investigators resort to simplified approaches based on the Hertzian solution. Unfortunately, for small samples and large indentation depths, these solutions are inaccurate. We set out to use machine learning to provide an alternative strategy. We first used the finite element method to create a large synthetic data set. We then used these data to train neural networks to inversely identify material parameters from load-displacement curves. To this end, we took two different approaches. First, we learned the indentation forward problem, which we then applied within an iterative framework to identify material parameters. Second, we learned the inverse problem of directly identifying material parameters. We show that both approaches are effective at identifying the parameters of the neo-Hookean and Gent models. Specifically, when applied to synthetic data, our approaches are accurate even for small sample sizes and at deep indentation. Additionally, our approaches are fast, especially compared to the inverse finite element approach. Finally, our approaches worked on unseen experimental data from thin mouse brain samples. Here, our approaches proved robust to experimental noise across over 1000 samples. By providing open access to our data and code, we hope to support others that conduct nano-indentation on soft materials.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNanotechnologyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37622379
PMCPMC10499084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.