Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622323›Full record

ArticleInternational psychogeriatrics2024

Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on everyday preferences for persons with cognitive impairment.

James M Wilkins, Joseph J Locascio, Teresa Gomez-Isla, Bradley T Hyman, Deborah Blacker, Brent P Forester, Olivia I Okereke

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International psychogeriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M WilkinsDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-8532
Joseph J LocascioDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Teresa Gomez-IslaDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Bradley T HymanDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Deborah BlackerDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brent P ForesterDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA.
Olivia I OkerekeDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
THE ROLE OF ADVANCED CAA IN ALZHEIMER'S DEMENTIAP50AG005134 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HYMAN, BRADLEY T. · 1985 to 2018
$42.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STEVEN E ARNOLD · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541NIA NIH HHS L30 AG060475NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social distancing guidelines and restrictions brought on changes in the everyday experiences of older adults. It is not clear, however, to what extent the pandemic has impacted the importance of everyday preferences for persons with cognitive impairment (CI) or the proxy ratings of those preferences. The sample of this study included 27 dyads of persons with CI and their care partners. The Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory was used to assess importance of preferences among persons with CI; care partners completed concurrent proxy assessments. Mixed random and fixed effects longitudinal models were used to evaluate changes in ratings and concordance levels between persons with CI and care partners prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Persons with CI rated autonomous choice preferences as significantly more important during the COVID-19 pandemic than before; there was no association between the COVID-19 pandemic and change in other everyday preferences domains or discrepancy in proxy assessments of everyday preferences. Identifying avenues to support and provide for autonomy in the decision-making of older adults with CI may offer a way forward in mitigating the psychological and behavioral impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in this population.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversChoice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePersonal Autonomyautonomy and self-efficacydecision-makingDementia

Identifiers

PMID37622323
PMCPMC10894308
OpenAlexW4386153063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.