ArticleRevista de ciencias forenses de Honduras2022
Informed consent of postmortem sampling: Bibliographic review.
Article in Revista de ciencias forenses de Honduras, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nationwide survey of Japanese public perceptions of the necessity of antemortem informed consent for Rapid Autopsy Programs (RAP): comparison with other methods of postmortem human tissue utilization.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- "The significance of clinical foetal autopsy for reproductive health care: an ethical analysis in the German context".Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Informed consent is based on the principle of personal autonomy, the moral conception of respect for the dignity of the human being and therefore on his freedom. The rest of the universal bioethical principles are articulated in the informed consent process: non-maleficence, justice, and beneficence. Objective: Establish the situations in which it is pertinent to apply informed consent in the taking of postmortem samples from a bioethical approach versus a legal approach. Methodology: A review was carried out in: SCIELO, LILACS, IBECS, CUMED, NIH, Repository of the Pan American Health Organization; using keywords: informed consent, human rights, autonomy, bioethics, autopsy, post-mortem samples and forensic doctors and a combination of these. The inclusion criteria: articles with a maximum age of five years, in Spanish and English with free access. Results: 113 articles were obtained using the keywords and their combinations, plus another 43 additional records identified from other sources such as laws, regulations, etc. By eliminating the sources: duplicates, not relevant, disabled, and incomplete, a total of 49 articles were worked on. Conclusions: There is a need to include in the national and international ethical guidelines that regulate scientific research and guidelines to follow on the completion of the informed consent process in studies that involve postmortem samples, after their primary use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.