ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors
RR Interval-based Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a life threatening disease and can cause stroke, heart failure, and sometimes death. To reduce the rate of mortality and morbidity due to increased prevalence of AF, early detection of the same becomes a prior concern. Traditional machine learning (TML) algorithms and ensemble machine learning (EML) algorithms are proposed to detect AF in this article. The performances of both these methods are compared in this study. Methodology involves computation of RR interval features extracted from electrocardiogram and its classification into: normal, AF, and other rhythms. TML techniques such as Classification and Regression Tree, K Nearest Neighbor, C4.5, Iterative Dichotomiser 3, Support Vector Machine and EML classifier such as Random Forest (RF), and Rotation Forest are used for classification. The proposed method is evaluated using PhysioNet challenge 2017. During the tenfold cross validation, it is observed that RF classifier provided good classification accuracy of 99.10% with area under the curve of 0.998. Apart from contributing a new methodology, the proposed study also experimentally proves higher performance with ensemble learning method, RF. The methodology has many applications in health care management systems including defibrillators, cardiac pacemakers, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.