Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622040›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors

RR Interval-based Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms.

S K Shrikanth Rao, Roshan Joy Martis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S K Shrikanth RaoDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vivekananda College of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, Karnataka, India.
Roshan Joy MartisDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Global Academy of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a life threatening disease and can cause stroke, heart failure, and sometimes death. To reduce the rate of mortality and morbidity due to increased prevalence of AF, early detection of the same becomes a prior concern. Traditional machine learning (TML) algorithms and ensemble machine learning (EML) algorithms are proposed to detect AF in this article. The performances of both these methods are compared in this study. Methodology involves computation of RR interval features extracted from electrocardiogram and its classification into: normal, AF, and other rhythms. TML techniques such as Classification and Regression Tree, K Nearest Neighbor, C4.5, Iterative Dichotomiser 3, Support Vector Machine and EML classifier such as Random Forest (RF), and Rotation Forest are used for classification. The proposed method is evaluated using PhysioNet challenge 2017. During the tenfold cross validation, it is observed that RF classifier provided good classification accuracy of 99.10% with area under the curve of 0.998. Apart from contributing a new methodology, the proposed study also experimentally proves higher performance with ensemble learning method, RF. The methodology has many applications in health care management systems including defibrillators, cardiac pacemakers, etc.

Indexed as

area under the curveAtrial fibrillationC4.5classification and regression treeDiscrete wavelet transformElectrocardiogramIterative Dichotomiser 3K-NNRandom Forestrotation forestSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID37622040
PMCPMC10445672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.