Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37622035›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

The STOP COVID 2 Study: Fluvoxamine vs Placebo for Outpatients With Symptomatic COVID-19, a Fully Remote Randomized Controlled Trial.

Angela M Reiersen, Caline Mattar, Rachel A Bender Ignacio, David R Boulware, Todd C Lee, Rachel Hess, Alexander J Lankowski, Emily G McDonald, J Philip Miller, William G Powderly and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04668950 (Fluvoxamine for Early Treatment of Covid-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04668950 phase3completednot on this map

Fluvoxamine for Early Treatment of Covid-19: a Fully-remote, Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2020 to 2021Enrolled670ConditionsCovid19, CoronavirusArmsFluvoxamine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela M ReiersenDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-4590
Caline MattarDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-2916
Rachel A Bender IgnacioVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-1447
David R BoulwareDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-0060
Todd C LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-4239
Rachel HessDivision of Health System Innovation and Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Alexander J LankowskiVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-7242
Emily G McDonaldDepartment of Medicine, Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0783-0624
J Philip MillerInstitute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-6846
William G PowderlyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Matthew F PullenDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-7487
Jeffrey T RadoDepartments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael W RichDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-9391
Joshua T SchifferVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-1621
Julie SchweigerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-0305
Adam M SpivakDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1815-7893
Angela StevensDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Simone N VigodDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-9639
Payal AgarwalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lei YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Michael YinglingDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Torie R GettingerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Charles F ZorumskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Eric J LenzeDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-9368
Washington University in St. Louis · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior randomized clinical trials have reported benefit of fluvoxamine ≥200 mg/d vs placebo for patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully remote multisite clinical trial evaluated whether fluvoxamine prevents clinical deterioration in higher-risk outpatients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Between December 2020 and May 2021, nonhospitalized US and Canadian participants with confirmed symptomatic infection received fluvoxamine (50 mg on day 1, 100 mg twice daily thereafter) or placebo for 15 days. The primary modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included participants who started the intervention within 7 days of symptom onset with a baseline oxygen saturation ≥92%. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration within 15 days of randomization, defined as having both (1) shortness of breath (severity ≥4 on a 0-10 scale or requiring hospitalization) Results: A total of 547 participants were randomized and met mITT criteria (n = 272 fluvoxamine, n = 275 placebo). The Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended stopping early for futility related to lower-than-predicted event rates and declining accrual concurrent with vaccine availability in the United States and Canada. Clinical deterioration occurred in 13 (4.8%) participants in the fluvoxamine group and 15 (5.5%) participants in the placebo group (absolute difference at day 15, 0.68%; 95% CI, -3.0% to 4.4%; log-rank Conclusions: This trial did not find fluvoxamine efficacious in preventing clinical deterioration in unvaccinated outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. It was stopped early and underpowered due to low primary outcome rates. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04668950.

Indexed as

clinical trialCOVID-19fluvoxaminefully remotesigma1 receptor agonist

Identifiers

PMID37622035
PMCPMC10445518
OpenAlexW4385622039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.