Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37621751›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2023

Comparison of modified gunsight suture technique and traditional interrupted suture in enterostomy closure.

Chang Chen, Xiang Zhang, Zhi-Qiang Cheng, Bin-Bin Zhang, Xin Li, Ke-Xin Wang, Yong Dai, Yan-Lei Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Zhi-Qiang ChengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Bin-Bin ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University De Zhou Hospital, Dezhou 254300, Shandong Province, China.
Xin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Huantai Branch of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Zibo 255000, Shandong Province, China.
Ke-Xin WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Yong DaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Yan-Lei WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China. yanleiwang@hotmail.com.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic enterostomy surgery is a common surgical approach used to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients who have undergone partial intestinal resection due to trauma or tumors. However, the traditional interrupted suturing technique used in enterostomy closure surgery has several issues, including longer surgical incisions and higher incision tension, which can increase the risk of postoperative complications. To address these issues, scholars have proposed the use of a "gunsight suture" technique. This technique involves using a gunsight incision instead of a traditional linear incision, leaving a gap in the center for the drainage of blood and fluid to reduce the risk of infection. Building on this technique, we propose an improved gunsight suture technique. A drainage tube is placed at the lowest point of the incision and close the gap in the center of the gunsight suture, which theoretically facilitates early postoperative mobility and reduces the burden of dressing changes, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative complications.

aimTo compare the effectiveness of improved gunsight suture technique with traditional interrupted suture in closing intestinal stomas.

methodsIn this study, a retrospective, single-center case analysis was conducted on 270 patients who underwent prophylactic ileostomy closure surgery at the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Qilu Hospital from April 2017 to December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: 135 patients received sutures using the improved gunsight method, while the remaining 135 patients were sutured with the traditional interrupted suture method. We collected data on a variety of parameters, such as operation time, postoperative pain score, body temperature, length of hospital stays, laboratory indicators, incidence of incisional complications, number of wound dressing changes, and hospitalization costs. Non-parametric tests and chi-square tests were utilized for data analysis.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in general patient information between the two groups, including the interval between the first surgery and the stoma closure [132 (105, 184) d

conclusionIn stoma closure surgery, the improved gunsight technique can reduce the incision infection rate, shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce wound tension, and provide better wound cosmetic effects compared to traditional interrupted suture.

Indexed as

EnterostomySurgical WoundHumansRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionSuturesAbdominal wound closure techniqueEnterostomyHospital costsHospital staySurgical wound infectionSuture techniques

Identifiers

PMID37621751
PMCPMC10445006
OpenAlexW4385506772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.