ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2023
A Customized Bayesian Algorithm to Optimize Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions.
Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI for controllable protein sequence design: A survey.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Optimized Machine Learning for Autonomous Enzymatic Reaction Intensification in a Self-Driving Lab.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Accelerated Development of Novel Biomass-Based Polyurethane Adhesives via Machine Learning.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Enzyme catalytic efficiency prediction: employing convolutional neural networks and XGBoost.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design of experiments (DoE) plays an important role in optimizing the catalytic performance of chemical reactions. The most commonly used DoE relies on the response surface methodology (RSM) to model the variable space of experimental conditions with the fewest number of experiments. However, the RSM leads to an exponential increase in the number of required experiments as the number of variables increases. Herein we describe a Bayesian optimization algorithm (BOA) to optimize the continuous parameters (e.g., temperature, reaction time, reactant and enzyme concentrations, etc.) of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with the aim of maximizing performance. Compared to existing Bayesian optimization methods, we propose an improved algorithm that leads to better results under limited resources and time for experiments. To validate the versatility of the BOA, we benchmarked its performance with biocatalytic C-C bond formation and amination for the optimization of the turnover number. Gratifyingly, up to 80% improvement compared to RSM and up to 360% improvement vs previous Bayesian optimization algorithms were obtained. Importantly, this strategy enabled simultaneous optimization of both the enzyme's activity and selectivity for cross-benzoin condensation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.