ArticleTherapeutic advances in rare disease
Toward representative genomic research: the children's rare disease cohorts experience.
Article in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- What comes next? Follow through care after genetic diagnosis in infancy.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Article
- Equity-focused implementation to enhance access to rare disease genomic research and understand diverse perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Remote EEG acquisition in Angelman syndrome using PANDABox-EEG.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Hospital-wide access to genomic data advanced pediatric rare disease research and clinical outcomes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Survey of the Landscape of Society Practice Guidelines for Genetic Testing of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Annals of neurology · 2024Review
- Utility of Genome Sequencing After Nondiagnostic Exome Sequencing in Unexplained Pediatric Epilepsy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Increasing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Rare Disease Clinical Trials.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Review
- The Brain Gene Registry: a data snapshot.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
- Finding buried genetic test results in the electronic health record is inefficient and variable across institutions.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
- Updated demographics categories to capture the true diversity of an international registry of rare disease patients.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Due to racial, cultural, and linguistic marginalization, some populations experience disproportionate barriers to genetic testing in both clinical and research settings. It is difficult to track such disparities due to non-inclusive self-reported race and ethnicity categories within the electronic health record (EHR). Inclusion and access for all populations is critical to achieve health equity and to capture the full spectrum of rare genetic disease. Objective: We aimed to create revised race and ethnicity categories. Additionally, we identified racial and ethnic under-representation amongst three cohorts: (1) the general Boston Children's Hospital patient population (general BCH), (2) the BCH patient population that underwent clinical genomic testing (clinical sequencing), and (3) Children's Rare Disease Cohort (CRDC) research initiative participants. Design and Methods: Race and ethnicity data were collected from the EHRs of the general BCH, clinical sequencing, and CRDC cohorts. We constructed a single comprehensive set of race and ethnicity categories. EHR-based race and ethnicity variables were mapped within each cohort to the revised categories. Then, the numbers of patients within each revised race and ethnicity category were compared across cohorts. Results: There was a significantly lower percentage of Black or African American/African, non-Hispanic/non-Latine individuals in the CRDC cohort compared with the general BCH cohort, but there was no statistically significant difference between the CRDC and the clinical sequencing cohorts. There was a significantly lower percentage of multi-racial, Hispanic/Latine individuals in the CRDC cohort than the clinical sequencing cohort. White, non-Hispanic/non-Latine individuals were over-represented in the CRDC compared to the two other groups. Conclusion: We highlight underrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic populations in sequencing cohorts compared to the general hospital population. We propose a range of measures to address these disparities, to strive for equitable future precision medicine-based clinical care and for the benefit of the whole rare disease community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.