Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37621531›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2023

Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens.

Bodhi Agustono, Sunaryo Hadi Warsito, Maya Nurwartanti Yunita, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Sri Hidanah, Emy Koestanti Sabdoningrum, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Mirni Lamid, Gandul Atik Yuliani, Shekhar Chhetri and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bodhi AgustonoDivision of Animal Husbandry, School of Health and Life Sciences (SIKIA), Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Sunaryo Hadi WarsitoDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Maya Nurwartanti YunitaDivision of Pathology Veterinary, School of Health and Life Sciences (SIKIA), Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Widya Paramita LokapirnasariDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Sri HidanahDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Emy Koestanti SabdoningrumDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Mohammad Anam Al-ArifDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Mirni LamidDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Gandul Atik YulianiDepartment of Veterinary Science, Division of Basic Veterinary, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Shekhar ChhetriDepartment of Animal Science, Royal University of Bhutan, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Sarasati WindriaDepartment of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Airlangga University · IDDepartment of Animal Husbandry · INPadjadjaran University · IDRoyal University of Bhutan · BT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Antibiotics that increase growth have long been employed as a component of chicken growth. Long-term, unchecked usage may lead to microbial imbalance, resistance, and immune system suppression. Probiotics are a suitable and secure feed additive that may be provided as a solution. The objective of this research was to ascertain the effects of dietary multistrain probiotics ( Materials and Methods: One hundred ISA Brown commercial layer chicks of the same body weight (BW) that were 5 days old were divided into five treatments, each with four replicates and four chicks in each duplicate. There were five different dietary interventions: (T1) 100% base feed; (T2) base feed with 2.5 g of antibiotic growth promoter/kg feed; (T3) base feed plus probiotics; (T4) base feed at 1 mL/kg with probiotics; and (T5) base feed with probiotics, 3 mL/kg feed, 5 mL/kg of feed. The parameters observed were performance, internal and exterior egg quality, and the morphology (length and weight) of laying hens' reproductive organs. Results: Probiotic supplementation ( Conclusion: When laying hens were between 17 and 21 weeks old, during the early laying period, microbiota inoculum supplements (

Indexed as

external quality eggsgood healthgrowth performanceinternal quality eggsprobioticsreproductive organs

Identifiers

PMID37621531
PMCPMC10446726
OpenAlexW4385307716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.