Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37621485›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2023

Assessing Socket Fit Effects on Pressure and Shear at a Transtibial Residuum/Socket Interface.

Kirstie M Devin, Jinghua Tang, David Moser, Liudi Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Testing an adjustable prosthetic socket in a simulated military environment.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirstie M DevinSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-2375
Jinghua TangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-5891
David MoserSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6098-6022
Liudi JiangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-825X
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluctuations in residuum volume during daily activities are known to occur in lower-limb amputees. This can cause frequent changes to fit, which cannot be accommodated by commonly-used prosthetic sockets. The real-time effects, if any, of these minor socket fit changes on interface biomechanics have not been studied extensively. Amputees commonly use different layers of socks to accommodate frequent volume fluctuations, enabling adjustment of socket fit. We, thus, altered socket fit levels via addition/removal of sock layers to a transtibial amputee who habitually-donned two-sock layers to mimic relatively looser and tighter socket fits. Interface pressure and shear sensors were placed at known prominent load-bearing sites of the transtibial residuum/socket interface, i.e., patellar tendon (PT), popliteal fossa (PF), and anterior-distal (AD) end, to measure real-time biomechanical interactions during standing and level walking. Although socket fit level was only slightly modified, changes in interface pressure and shear across anatomical sites were still observed. Tighter fit corresponds to notable pressure reduction at AD during early stance and pressure increase at PT during terminal stance due to the residuum being pushed up. Shear-to-pressure ratios were used to assess comfort, while pressure- and shear-time integrals were used to assess tissue health. We observed more notable changes at tissue sites (e.g., AD and PF). Combined evaluation of pressure and shear, including shear-to-pressure ratio and time integrals, may offer insight for residuum care.

Identifiers

PMID37621485
PMCPMC10447010
OpenAlexW4385856636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.