Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37621448›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2023

Understanding the challenges of disaster victim identification: perspectives of Australian forensic practitioners.

Natasa Adamovic, Loene M Howes, Rob White, Roberta Julian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasa AdamovicSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education and Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies (TILES), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Loene M HowesSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education and Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies (TILES), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Rob WhiteSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education and Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies (TILES), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Roberta JulianSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education and Tasmanian Institute of Law Enforcement Studies (TILES), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disaster victim identification (DVI) is an important process in the aftermath of disasters to provide answers for the families and communities of victims. Australian forensic practitioners contribute to such processes internationally under difficult post-disaster circumstances. The aim of the study was to better understand the challenges experienced by forensic practitioners in international DVI operations. Participants (

Indexed as

disastersdisaster victim identificationforensic practitionersoperational challengespostmortem phase

Identifiers

PMID37621448
PMCPMC10445580
OpenAlexW4381805649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.