Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37621295›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2023

Outcomes of Cochlear implantation in early-deafened patients with Waardenburg syndrome: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Amy Lovett, Michael Eastwood, Chris Metcalfe, Jameel Muzaffar, Peter Monksfield, Manohar Bance

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy LovettRoyal Stoke University Hospital Stoke on Trent UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-3902
Michael EastwoodRoyal Stoke University Hospital Stoke on Trent UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-921X
Chris MetcalfeRoyal Stoke University Hospital Stoke on Trent UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8790-2722
Jameel MuzaffarUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Edgbaston UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0269
Peter MonksfieldUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Edgbaston UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7343-7105
Manohar BanceDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-3617
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims to establish the expected hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with profound congenital deafness secondary to Waardenburg syndrome (WS). Methods: A systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Results: Searches identified 186 abstracts and full texts. Of these, 16 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 179 patients and at least 194 implants. Hearing outcomes of those receiving cochlear implantation were generally good. Five studies included genetic analysis of one or more of the participants. A total of 11 peri/post-operative complications were reported. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, mainly comprising noncontrolled case series with small cohort size. All studies were OCEBM grade III-IV. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation in congenitally deafened children with Waardenburg Syndrome is a well-established intervention as a method of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the uncommon nature of the condition, there is a lack of large-scale high-quality studies examining the use of cochlear implantation in this patient group. However, overall outcomes following implantation are positive with the majority of patients demonstrating improved audiometry, speech perception and speech intelligibility supporting its use in appropriately selected cases.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantationWaardenburg syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37621295
PMCPMC10446317
OpenAlexW4383956237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.