ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2023
Primary versus salvage intratympanic steroid treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Salvage treatment strategies for refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss-a comprehensive review and meta-analysis with practical recommendations.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of intratympanic methylprednisolone versus standard therapy in adult sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Comparison between intratympanic injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A randomized clinical trial.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Primary versus salvage intratympanic steroid treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this research is to compare primary and salvage intratympanic (IT) steroid treatments in terms of hearing outcomes in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Methods: The patients were randomized into two (primary and salvage) groups. Both groups received systemic steroid treatment for 2 weeks. The primary group also received IT dexamethasone injection three times during the treatment period, whereas the salvage group received IT dexamethasone injection only if no or slight recovery was noted at the 2-week follow-up. If needed, salvage steroid injection was administered three times during the following 2 weeks. Hearing recovery was analyzed according to the modified American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria. Results: The degrees of hearing improvement at the 3-month follow-up were similar in the two groups. Compared with baseline, the pure-tone average values and speech discrimination scores improved by 38.45 ± 21.95 dB HL and 34.32% ± 30.55%, respectively, in the primary group and 36.80 ± 22.33 dB HL and 31.87% ± 27.88%, respectively, in the salvage group ( Conclusion: Primary and salvage IT steroid treatments for ISSNHL led to similar outcomes. In summary, salvage IT steroid injection is recommended for patients with ISSNHL patients to prevent unnecessary IT injection. Level of evidence: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.