Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620955›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Regenerative peripheral nerve interface reduces the incidence of neuroma in the lower limbs after amputation: a retrospective study based on ultrasound.

Zhiyu Lin, Ping Yu, Zheng Chen, Guangxue Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07420192 (The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07420192 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery on Neuropathic Pain and Functional Outcomes in Major Lower Extremity Amputations

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2026 to 2030Enrolled20ConditionsSymptomatic Neuroma, Phantom Limb Pain After Amputation, Residual Limb Pain, Neuropathic PainArmsRegenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiyu Lin *Plastic Surgery Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Ping Yu *Ultrasound Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Zheng ChenUltrasound Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Guangxue LiPlastic Surgery Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. luckylgx1012@163.com.
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission No. Z221100007422069Peking University People's Hospital Research and Development Funds RDY2020-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmputees suffer from symptomatic neuroma and phantom limb pain. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) has recently been regarded as an effective method to prevent neuroma after amputation. However, the verifications of RPNI efficacy are mostly based on subjective evaluation, lacking objective approaches. This study aims to unveil the effect of RPNI on preventing neuroma formation and provide evidence supporting the efficacy of RPNI based on ultrasound.

methodsAmputees of lower limb at Peking University People's Hospital from July 2020 to March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data collected consisted of general information, pathology of primary disease, history of limb-salvage treatment, amputation level of nerve, pain scales such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI). Three months after amputation, the transverse diameter, anteroposterior diameter, and cross-sectional area of neuromas in stump nerves at the end of residual limbs were measured using ultrasound and compared to adjacent normal nerves.

resultsFourteen patients were enrolled in the study, including 7 in the traditional amputation group (TA group) and 7 in the RPNI group. There was no significant difference in basic information and amputation sites between the two groups. The NRS and MFPDI scores of patients in RPNI group were significantly lower than those in TA group, and decreased with the follow-up time increasing, indicating that RPNI could reduce symptomatic neuroma pain. The comparison of preoperative ultrasound and postoperative pathology showed ultrasound could reflect the size of neuroma in vivo. Independent-sample t tests indicated that the ratios of anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter and area of the cross section of both the neuroma and adjacent normal nerve obtained via ultrasound were significantly reduced in the RPNI group.

conclusionThis study suggested that RPNI can effectively prevent the formation of symptomatic neuroma after amputation using ultrasound.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityNeuromaAmputation, SurgicalHumansIncidencePainPeripheral NervesRetrospective StudiesAssessmentRegenerative peripheral nerve interfaceSymptomatic neuromaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37620955
PMCPMC10463429
OpenAlexW4386138308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.