Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620865›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Understanding primary care transformation and implications for ageing populations and health inequalities: a systematic scoping review of new models of primary health care in OECD countries and China.

D A G Henderson, E Donaghy, M Dozier, B Guthrie, H Huang, M Pickersgill, E Stewart, A Thompson, H H X Wang, S W Mercer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implications of skill-mix change in general practice: secondary analysis of data from the GP Patient Survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative evaluation of the views of patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

D A G HendersonCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
E DonaghyCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M DozierCollege of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
B GuthrieCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
H HuangCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M PickersgillCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
E StewartSchool of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
A ThompsonSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
H H X WangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
S W MercerCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. stewart.mercer@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-3664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have introduced reforms with the aim of primary care transformation (PCT). Common objectives include meeting service delivery challenges associated with ageing populations and health inequalities. To date, there has been little research comparing PCT internationally. Our aim was to examine PCT and new models of primary care by conducting a systematic scoping review of international literature in order to describe major policy changes including key 'components', impacts of new models of care, and barriers and facilitators to PCT implementation.

methodsWe undertook a systematic scoping review of international literature on PCT in OECD countries and China (published protocol: https://osf.io/2afym ). Ovid [MEDLINE/Embase/Global Health], CINAHL Plus, and Global Index Medicus were searched (01/01/10 to 28/08/21). Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts with data extraction by a single reviewer. A narrative synthesis of findings followed.

resultsA total of 107 studies from 15 countries were included. The most frequently employed component of PCT was the expansion of multidisciplinary teams (MDT) (46% of studies). The most frequently measured outcome was GP views (27%), with  < 20% measuring patient views or satisfaction. Only three studies evaluated the effects of PCT on ageing populations and 34 (32%) on health inequalities with ambiguous results. For the latter, PCT involving increased primary care access showed positive impacts whilst no benefits were reported for other components. Analysis of 41 studies citing barriers or facilitators to PCT implementation identified leadership, change, resources, and targets as key themes.

conclusionsCountries identified in this review have used a range of approaches to PCT with marked heterogeneity in methods of evaluation and mixed findings on impacts. Only a minority of studies described the impacts of PCT on ageing populations, health inequalities, or from the patient perspective. The facilitators and barriers identified may be useful in planning and evaluating future developments in PCT.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentAgingChinaHumansPrimary Health CareAgeingHealth inequalitiesPrimary careScoping review

Identifiers

PMID37620865
PMCPMC10463288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.