Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620835›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

The impact of maternal morbidity on cesarean section rates: exploring a Latin American network of sentinel facilities using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.

Claudio Sosa, Bremen de Mucio, Mercedes Colomar, Luis Mainero, Maria L Costa, Jose P Guida, Renato T Souza, Adriana G Luz, José G Cecatti, Maria H Sousa and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implementation ofAJOG global reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Claudio SosaLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Bremen de MucioLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Mercedes ColomarLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Luis MaineroLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Maria L CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Jose P GuidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Adriana G LuzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
José G CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. cecatti@unicamp.br.
Maria H SousaJundiaí School of Medicine - HU/FMJ, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil.
Carmen M CruzHospital Berta Calderon Roque, Managua, Nicaragua.
Luz M ChevezHospital Berta Calderon Roque, Managua, Nicaragua.
Rita LopezHospital Berta Calderon Roque, Managua, Nicaragua.
Gema CarrilloHospital España, Chinandega, Nicaragua.
Ulises RizoHospital España, Chinandega, Nicaragua.
Erika E Saint HillaireHospital San Lorenzo de Los Mina, Santo Domingo , Dominican Republic.
William E ArriagaHospital Regional de Ocidente, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala.
Rosa M GuadalupeHospital Regional de Ocidente, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala.
Carlos OchoaHospital San Felipe, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Freddy GonzalezHospital Roberto Suazo Cordova, La Paz, Honduras.
Rigoberto CastroHospital Roberto Suazo Cordova, La Paz, Honduras.
Allan StefanHospital Leonardo Martinez Valenzuela, San Pedro Sula, Honduras.
Amanda MorenoHospital Boliviano Japones, El Alto, Bolivia.
Suzanne J SerruyaLatin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRCentro Universitario de Occidente · GTFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí · BRHonduras Foundation for Agricultural Research · HNInstituto Boliviano de Ciencia y Tecnología Nuclear · BOUniversidad Metropolitana de Honduras · HN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatin America has the highest Cesarean Section Rates (CSR) in the world. Robson's Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) was developed to enable understanding the CSR in different groups of women, classified according to obstetric characteristics into one of ten groups. The size of each CS group may provide helpful data on quality of care in a determined region or setting. Data can potentially be used to compare the impact of conditions such as maternal morbidity on CSR. The objective of this study is to understand the impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) on CSR in ten different groups of RTGCS.

methodsSecondary analysis of childbirth information from 2018 to 2021, including 8 health facilities from 5 Latin American and Caribbean countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic), using a surveillance database (SIP-Perinatal Information System, in Spanish) implemented in different settings across Latin America. Women were classified into one of RTGCS. The frequency of each group and its respective CSR were described. Furthermore, the sample was divided into two groups, according to maternal outcomes: women without SMM and those who experienced SMM, considering Potentially Life-threatening Conditions, Maternal Near Miss and Maternal Death as the continuum of morbidity.

resultsAvailable data were obtained from 92,688 deliveries using the Robson Classification. Overall CSR was around 38%. Group 5 was responsible for almost one-third of cesarean sections. SMM occurred in 6.7% of cases. Among these cases, the overall CSR was almost 70% in this group. Group 10 had a major role (preterm deliveries). Group 5 (previous Cesarean section) had a very high CSR within the group, regardless of the occurrence of maternal morbidity (over 80%).

conclusionCesarean section rate was higher in women experiencing SMM than in those without SMM in Latin America. SMM was associated with higher Cesarean section rates, especially in groups 1 and 3. Nevertheless, group 5 was the major contributor to the overall CSR.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionFamilyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLatin AmericaParturitionPregnancyRacial GroupsCesarean sectionRobson classificationSevere maternal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID37620835
PMCPMC10464484
OpenAlexW4386141134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.