Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620760›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2023

Comprehensive geriatric assessment delivered by advanced nursing practitioners within primary care setting: a mixed-methods pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Reza Safari, Jessica Jackson, Louise Boole

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03394534 ('Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment' for Older Adults With Frailty Within Primary Care Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03394534 nacompletednot on this map

'Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment' for Older Adults With Frailty Within Primary Care Setting: A Randomised Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of DerbyRan2019 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsFrailtyArmsCGA group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reza SafariCollege of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby, DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UK. m.safari@derby.ac.uk.
Jessica JacksonCollege of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby, DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UK.
Louise BooleCollege of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby, DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UK.
University of Derby · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)is a widely accepted intervention for frailty and can be cost-effective within a primary care setting.

objectiveTo explore the feasibility of identifying older adults with frailty and assess the subsequent implementation of a tailored CGA with care and support plan by Advanced Nursing Practitioners (ANPs).

methodsA mixed-method parallel randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants were recruited from two General Practice (GP) centres between January and June 2019. Older adults with confirmed frailty, as assessed by practice nurses, were randomised, using a web service, to the intervention or treatment-as-usual (TAU) groups for six months with an interim and a final review. Data were collected on feasibility, health service usage, function, quality of life, loneliness, and participants' experience and perception of the intervention. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse within and between-group differences. P-values were adjusted to account for type I error. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted.

resultsOne hundred sixty four older adults were invited to participate, of which 44.5% (n = 72) were randomised to either the TAU (n = 37) or intervention (n = 35) groups. All participants in the intervention group were given the baseline, interim and final reviews. Eight participants in each group were lost to post-intervention outcome assessment. The health service use (i.e. hospital admissions, GP/emergency calls and GP/Accident Emergency attendance) was slightly higher in the TAU group; however, none of the outcome data showed statistical significance between-group differences. The TAU group showed a deterioration in the total functional independence and its motor and cognition components post-intervention (p < .05), though the role limitation due to physical function and pain outcomes improved (p < .05). The qualitative findings indicate that participants appreciated the consistency of care provided by ANPs, experienced positive therapeutic relationship and were connected to wider services. DISCUSSION: Frailty identification and intervention delivery in the community by ANPs were feasible. The study shows that older adults with frailty living in the community might benefit from intervention delivered by ANPs. It is suggested to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in sufficiently powered future research. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The protocol is available at clinicaltirals.gov, ID: NCT03394534; 09/01/2018.

Indexed as

FrailtyGeriatric AssessmentAgedFeasibility StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeAdvanced Nursing PractitionerComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentFrailtyOlder AdultsPrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID37620760
PMCPMC10463370
OpenAlexW4386121309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.