Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620647›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2024

3D-printed dosage forms for oral administration: a review.

Siying Pan, Sheng Ding, Xuhui Zhou, Ning Zheng, Meng Zheng, Juan Wang, Qingliang Yang, Gensheng Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siying PanCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
Sheng DingCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
Xuhui ZhouCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
Ning ZhengCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
Meng ZhengHuiyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Huiyuan Medical Health Industrial Park, Heping Town, Changxing County, Huzhou, 313100, China.
Juan WangHuiyuan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Huiyuan Medical Health Industrial Park, Heping Town, Changxing County, Huzhou, 313100, China.
Qingliang YangCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China. qyang@zjut.edu.cn.
Gensheng YangCollege of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China. yanggs@zjut.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 21808206National Natural Science Foundation of China 22078297Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY20B060007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral administration is the most commonly used form of treatment due to its advantages, including high patient compliance, convenient administration, and minimal preparation required. However, the traditional preparation process of oral solid preparation has many defects. Although continuous manufacturing line that combined all the unit operations has been developed and preliminarily applied in the pharmaceutical industry, most of the currently used manufacturing processes are still complicated and discontinuous. As a result, these complex production steps will lead to low production efficiency and high quality control risk of the final product. Additionally, the large-scale production mode is inappropriate for the personalized medicines, which commonly is customized with small amount. Several attractive techniques, such as hot-melt extrusion, fluidized bed pelletizing and spray drying, could effectively shorten the process flow, but still, they have inherent limitations that are challenging to address. As a novel manufacturing technique, 3D printing could greatly reduce or eliminate these disadvantages mentioned above, and could realize a desirable continuous production for small-scale personalized manufacturing. In recent years, due to the participation of 3D printing, the development of printed drugs has progressed by leaps and bounds, especially in the design of oral drug dosage forms. This review attempts to summarize the new development of 3D printing technology in oral preparation and also discusses their advantages and disadvantages as well as potential applications.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryTechnology, PharmaceuticalAdministration, OralHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPrinting, Three-DimensionalPharmaceutical Preparations3D printing3D printing techniquesControlled releaseOral pharmaceutical dosage formPharmaceutical polymer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.