Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620634›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

The time course of visual foraging in the lifespan: Spatial scanning, organization search, and target processing.

Marcos Bella-Fernández, Manuel Suero Suñé, Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcos Bella-FernándezFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Ivan Pavlov 6, 28029, Madrid, Spain. marcosbellafernandez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-0199
Manuel Suero SuñéFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Ivan Pavlov 6, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz Gil-Gómez de LiañoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Ivan Pavlov 6, 28029, Madrid, Spain. bgil.gomezdelianno@uam.es.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme FORAGEKID 793268Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad PSI2015-69358-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual foraging is a variant of visual search, consisting of searching for an undetermined number of targets among distractors (e.g., looking for various LEGO pieces in a box). Under non-exhaustive tasks, the observer scans the display, picking those targets needed, not necessarily all of them, before leaving the search. To understand how the organization of such natural foraging tasks works, several measures of spatial scanning and organization have been proposed in the exhaustive foraging literature: best-r, intertarget distances, PAO, and target intersections. In the present study, we apply these measures and new Bayesian indexes to determine how the time course of visual foraging is organized in a dynamic non-exhaustive paradigm. In a large sample of observers (279 participants, 4-25 years old), we compare feature and conjunction foraging and explore how factors like set size and time course, not previously tested in exhaustive foraging, might affect search organization in non-exhaustive dynamic tasks. The results replicate previous findings showing younger observers' searching being less organized, feature conditions being more organized than conjunction conditions, and organization leading to a more effective search. Interestingly, observers tend to be less organized as set size increases, and search is less organized within a patch as it advances in time: Search organization decreases when search termination is coming, suggesting organization measures as potential clues to understand quitting rules in search. Our results highlight the importance of studying search organization in foraging as a critical source of understanding complex cognitive processes in visual search.

Indexed as

AttentionLongevityAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolHumansReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung AdultForagingLifespanVisual organizationVisual search

Identifiers

PMID37620634
PMCPMC10867067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.