Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620554›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

An active learning approach to train a deep learning algorithm for tumor segmentation from brain MR images.

Andrew S Boehringer, Amirhossein Sanaat, Hossein Arabi, Habib Zaidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond uncertainty in modern active learning for trustworthy AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A deep learning model for generating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew S BoehringerDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amirhossein SanaatDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-5297

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung SNSF 320030_176052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study focuses on assessing the performance of active learning techniques to train a brain MRI glioma segmentation model.

methodsThe publicly available training dataset provided for the 2021 RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge was used in this study, consisting of 1251 multi-institutional, multi-parametric MR images. Post-contrast T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR images as well as ground truth manual segmentation were used as input for the model. The data were split into a training set of 1151 cases and testing set of 100 cases, with the testing set remaining constant throughout. Deep convolutional neural network segmentation models were trained using the NiftyNet platform. To test the viability of active learning in training a segmentation model, an initial reference model was trained using all 1151 training cases followed by two additional models using only 575 cases and 100 cases. The resulting predicted segmentations of these two additional models on the remaining training cases were then addended to the training dataset for additional training.

resultsIt was demonstrated that an active learning approach for manual segmentation can lead to comparable model performance for segmentation of brain gliomas (0.906 reference Dice score vs 0.868 active learning Dice score) while only requiring manual annotation for 28.6% of the data.

conclusionThe active learning approach when applied to model training can drastically reduce the time and labor spent on preparation of ground truth training data. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Active learning concepts were applied to a deep learning-assisted segmentation of brain gliomas from MR images to assess their viability in reducing the required amount of manually annotated ground truth data in model training. KEY POINTS: • This study focuses on assessing the performance of active learning techniques to train a brain MRI glioma segmentation model. • The active learning approach for manual segmentation can lead to comparable model performance for segmentation of brain gliomas. • Active learning when applied to model training can drastically reduce the time and labor spent on preparation of ground truth training data.

Indexed as

Active learningDeep learningGliomasMRISegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37620554
PMCPMC10449747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.