ArticleInsights into imaging2023
An active learning approach to train a deep learning algorithm for tumor segmentation from brain MR images.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesizing lumbar computed tomography myelography from plain computed tomography images using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning for detection and measurement of adrenal masses in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Improved AI-Assisted Image Recognition of Cervical Spine Vertebrae Enables Motion Pattern Analysis in Dynamic X-Ray Recordings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond uncertainty in modern active learning for trustworthy AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Optimizing MRI annotation workflows for high-accuracy deep learning thigh muscle segmentation in athletes.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning for automatic volumetric bowel segmentation on body CT images.European radiology · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery: Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Segment Anything Model (SAM) and Medical SAM (MedSAM) for Lumbar Spine MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Targeted radioligand therapy: physics and biology, internal dosimetry and other practical aspects duringTheranostics · 2025Review
- Contrastive Learning vs. Self-Learning vs. Deformable Data Augmentation in Semantic Segmentation of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Automated segment-level coronary artery calcium scoring on non-contrast CT: a multi-task deep-learning approach.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A deep learning model for generating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Segmentation method of magnetic resonance imaging brain tumor images based on improved UNet network.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Innovative Strategies for Early Autism Diagnosis: Active Learning and Domain Adaptation Optimization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study focuses on assessing the performance of active learning techniques to train a brain MRI glioma segmentation model.
methodsThe publicly available training dataset provided for the 2021 RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge was used in this study, consisting of 1251 multi-institutional, multi-parametric MR images. Post-contrast T1, T2, and T2 FLAIR images as well as ground truth manual segmentation were used as input for the model. The data were split into a training set of 1151 cases and testing set of 100 cases, with the testing set remaining constant throughout. Deep convolutional neural network segmentation models were trained using the NiftyNet platform. To test the viability of active learning in training a segmentation model, an initial reference model was trained using all 1151 training cases followed by two additional models using only 575 cases and 100 cases. The resulting predicted segmentations of these two additional models on the remaining training cases were then addended to the training dataset for additional training.
resultsIt was demonstrated that an active learning approach for manual segmentation can lead to comparable model performance for segmentation of brain gliomas (0.906 reference Dice score vs 0.868 active learning Dice score) while only requiring manual annotation for 28.6% of the data.
conclusionThe active learning approach when applied to model training can drastically reduce the time and labor spent on preparation of ground truth training data. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Active learning concepts were applied to a deep learning-assisted segmentation of brain gliomas from MR images to assess their viability in reducing the required amount of manually annotated ground truth data in model training. KEY POINTS: • This study focuses on assessing the performance of active learning techniques to train a brain MRI glioma segmentation model. • The active learning approach for manual segmentation can lead to comparable model performance for segmentation of brain gliomas. • Active learning when applied to model training can drastically reduce the time and labor spent on preparation of ground truth training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.