ArticleScientific reports2023
Using pseudo-labeling to improve performance of deep neural networks for animal identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual diagnostics for female genital schistosomiasis and the opportunity for improvement using computer vision.Parasitology · 2025Review
- EyeInvaS: Lowering Barriers to Public Participation in Invasive Alien Species Monitoring Through Deep Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- BloodProST: prediction of blood-secretory proteins through self-training.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Semi-supervised learning from small annotated data and large unlabeled data for fine-grained Participants, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes entity recognition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for livestock: a narrative review of the applications of computer vision systems and large language models for animal farming.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary approaches for animal identification use deep learning techniques to recognize coat color patterns and identify individual animals in a herd. However, deep learning algorithms usually require a large number of labeled images to achieve satisfactory performance, which creates the need to manually label all images when automated methods are not available. In this study, we evaluated the potential of a semi-supervised learning technique called pseudo-labeling to improve the predictive performance of deep neural networks trained to identify Holstein cows using labeled training sets of varied sizes and a larger unlabeled dataset. By using such technique to automatically label previously unlabeled images, we observed an increase in accuracy of up to 20.4 percentage points compared to using only manually labeled images for training. Our final best model achieved an accuracy of 92.7% on an independent testing set to correctly identify individuals in a herd of 59 cows. These results indicate that it is possible to achieve better performing deep neural networks by using images that are automatically labeled based on a small dataset of manually labeled images using a relatively simple technique. Such strategy can save time and resources that would otherwise be used for labeling, and leverage well annotated small datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.