ArticleScientific reports2023
Short-term streamflow modeling using data-intelligence evolutionary machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging multi-source data and teleconnection indices for enhanced runoff prediction using coupled deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Data-driven total organic carbon prediction using feature selection methods incorporated in an automated machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integration of Gaussian process regression and K means clustering for enhanced short term rainfall runoff modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel hybrid model by integrating TCN with TVFEMD and permutation entropy for monthly non-stationary runoff prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Nature-Inspired Intelligent Computing: A Comprehensive Survey.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for efficient water resources management. Machine learning (ML) models are the tools to meet this need. This paper presents a comparative research study focusing on hybridizing ML models with bioinspired optimization algorithms (BOA) for short-term multistep streamflow forecasting. Specifically, we focus on applying XGB, MARS, ELM, EN, and SVR models and various BOA, including PSO, GA, and DE, for selecting model parameters. The performances of the resulting hybrid models are compared using performance statistics, graphical analysis, and hypothesis testing. The results show that the hybridization of BOA with ML models demonstrates significant potential as a data-driven approach for short-term multistep streamflow forecasting. The PSO algorithm proved superior to the DE and GA algorithms in determining the optimal hyperparameters of ML models for each step of the considered time horizon. When applied with all BOA, the XGB model outperformed the others (SVR, MARS, ELM, and EN), best predicting the different steps ahead. XGB integrated with PSO emerged as the superior model, according to the considered performance measures and the results of the statistical tests. The proposed XGB hybrid model is a superior alternative to the current daily flow forecast, crucial for water resources planning and management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.