ArticleScientific reports2023
Fully automated F-wave corridor extraction and analysis algorithm for F-wave analyses and MUNE studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergent technologies in clinical neurophysiology to study the neuromuscular system: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
F-waves are used in motor unit number estimation (MUNE) studies, which require rapid dedicated software to perform calculations. The aim of this study is to define a mathematical method for a fully automated F-wave extraction algorithm to perform F-wave and MUNE studies while performing baseline corrections without distorting traces. Ten recordings from each class, such as healthy controls, polio patients and ALS patients, were included. Submaximal stimuli were applied to the median and ulnar nerves to record 300 traces from the abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles. The autocorrelation function and the signal of sum of all traces were used to find the location for the maximum amplitude of the F-waves. F-waves were revealed by using a cutting window. Linear line estimation was preferred for baseline corrections because it did not cause any distortion in the traces. The algorithm automatically revealed F-waves from all 30 recordings in accordance with the locations marked by a neurophysiologist. The execution of the algorithm was less than 2 (usually < 1) minutes when 300 traces were analyzed. Mean sMUP amplitudes and MUNE values are important for differentiating healthy controls from patients. Moreover, F-wave parameters belonging to polio patients on whom there was a relatively low number of studies conducted were also evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.