Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Formalizing psychological interventions through network control theory.

Julia Elina Stocker, Georgia Koppe, Hanna Reich, Saeideh Heshmati, Sarah Kittel-Schneider, Stefan G Hofmann, Tim Hahn, Han L J van der Maas, Lourens Waldorp, Hamidreza Jamalabadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia Elina StockerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Georgia KoppeDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Hanna ReichGerman Depression Foundation, Leipzig, Germany.
Saeideh HeshmatiDepartment of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.
Sarah Kittel-SchneiderDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan G HofmannDepartment of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Tim HahnInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Han L J van der MaasPsychological Methods Group, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lourens WaldorpPsychological Methods Group, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hamidreza JamalabadiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany. hamidreza.jamalabadi@uni-marburg.de.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLClaremont Graduate University · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Connectomes Related to Anxiety and Depression in AdolescentsU01MH108168 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIELI, JOHN, WHITFIELD-GABRIELI, SUSAN · 2015 to 2019
$4.6M
Neural Markers of Treatment Mechanisms and Prediction of Treatment Outcomes in Social AnxietyR01MH128377 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DANIEL G DILLON, JOHN GABRIELI · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128377NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH108168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing deployment of network representation to comprehend psychological phenomena, the question of whether and how networks can effectively describe the effects of psychological interventions remains elusive. Network control theory, the engineering study of networked interventions, has recently emerged as a viable methodology to characterize and guide interventions. However, there is a scarcity of empirical studies testing the extent to which it can be useful within a psychological context. In this paper, we investigate a representative psychological intervention experiment, use network control theory to model the intervention and predict its effect. Using this data, we showed that: (1) the observed psychological effect, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, relates to the regional network control theoretic metrics (average and modal controllability), (2) the size of change following intervention negatively correlates with a whole-network topology that quantifies the "ease" of change as described by control theory (control energy), and (3) responses after intervention can be predicted based on formal results from control theory. These insights assert that network control theory has significant potential as a tool for investigating psychological interventions. Drawing on this specific example and the overarching framework of network control theory, we further elaborate on the conceptualization of psychological interventions, methodological considerations, and future directions in this burgeoning field.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingPsychosocial InterventionConcept FormationEmpirical ResearchEngineering

Identifiers

PMID37620407
PMCPMC10449779
OpenAlexW4386126433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.