Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620275›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

How is transition to medical practice shaped by a novel transitional role? A mixed-methods study.

Bryan Burford, Karen Mattick, Daniele Carrieri, Anna Goulding, Thomas Gale, Nicola Brennan, Gillian Vance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryan BurfordSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK bryan.burford@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-7556
Karen MattickUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Daniele CarrieriUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-8430
Anna GouldingSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Thomas GaleCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research (CAMERa), Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Nicola BrennanCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research (CAMERa), Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Gillian VanceSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study considered a novel 'interim' transitional role for new doctors (termed 'FiY1', interim Foundation Year 1), bridging medical school and Foundation Programme (FP). Research questions considered effects on doctors' well-being and perceived preparedness, and influences on their experience of transition. While FiY1 was introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, findings have wider and ongoing relevance.

designA sequential mixed-methods study involved two questionnaire phases, followed by semi-structured interviews. In phase 1, questionnaires were distributed to doctors in FiY1 posts, and in phase 2, to all new FP doctors, including those who had not undertaken FiY1. SETTING AND

participantsParticipants were newly qualified doctors from UK medical schools, working in UK hospitals in 2020. 77% (n=668) of all participants across all phases had undertaken FiY1 before starting FP in August. The remainder started FP in August with varying experience beforehand. OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaires measured preparedness for practice, stress, anxiety, depression, burnout, identity, and tolerance of ambiguity. Interviews explored participants' experiences in more depth.

resultsAnalysis of questionnaires (phase 1 n=441 FiY1s, phase 2 n=477 FiY1s, 196 non-FiY1s) indicated that FiY1s felt more prepared than non-FiY1 colleagues for starting FP in August (β=2.71, 95% CI=2.21 to 3.22, p<0.0001), which persisted to October (β=1.85, CI=1.28 to 2.41, p<0.0001). Likelihood of feeling prepared increased with FiY1 duration (OR=1.02, CI=1.00 to 1.03, p=0.0097). Despite challenges to well-being during FiY1, no later detriment was apparent. Thematic analysis of interview data (n=22) identified different ways, structural and interpersonal, in which the FiY1 role enhanced doctors' emerging independence supported by systems and colleagues, providing 'supported autonomy'.

conclusionsAn explicitly transitional role can benefit doctors as they move from medical school to independent practice. We suggest that the features of supported autonomy are those of

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyAnxiety DisordersBehavior TherapyHumansPandemicsCOVID-19EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID37620275
PMCPMC10450058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.