Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620153›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

CT Perfusion Does Not Modify the Effect of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Endovascular Treatment in the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial.

N B Rex, R V McDonough, J M Ospel, N Kashani, A Sehgal, J C Fladt, R A McTaggart, R Nogueira, B Menon, A M Demchuk and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does Ischemic Core Volume Modify the Treatment Effect of Endovascular Thrombectomy?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

N B RexFrom the Department of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-1336
R V McDonoughDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.V.M., J.M.O., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8060-4490
J M OspelDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.V.M., J.M.O., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0029-6764
N KashaniDepartment of Neurosurgery (N.K.), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9752-784X
A SehgalDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences (J.M.O., A.S., J.C.F., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-7947
J C FladtDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences (J.M.O., A.S., J.C.F., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6700-2375
R A McTaggartFrom the Department of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0001-5853-5161
R NogueiraDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery (R.N.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
B MenonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.V.M., J.M.O., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3466-496X
A M DemchukDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.V.M., J.M.O., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4930-7789
M TymianskiNoNO Inc (M.T.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6311-9565
M D HillDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (N.B.R., R.V.M., J.M.O., B.M., A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-1543
ESCAPE-NA1 Investigators
University of Calgary · CABrown University · USNoNO (Canada) · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlthough reperfusion is associated with improved outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment, many patients still do poorly. We investigated whether CTP modifies the effect of near-complete reperfusion on clinical outcomes, ie, whether poor clinical outcomes despite near-complete reperfusion can be partly or fully explained by CTP findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsData are from the Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial. Admission CTP was processed using RAPID software, generating relative CBF and CBV volume maps at standard thresholds. CTP lesion volumes were compared in patients with-versus-without near-complete reperfusion. Associations between each CTP metric and clinical outcome (90-day mRS) were tested using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline imaging and clinical variables. Treatment-effect modification was assessed by introducing CTP lesion volume × reperfusion interaction terms in the models.

resultsCTP lesion volumes and reperfusion status were available in 410/1105 patients. CTP lesion volumes were overall larger in patients without near-complete reperfusion, albeit not always statistically significant. Increased CBF <34%, CBV <34%, CBV <38%, and CBV <42% lesion volumes were associated with worse clinical outcome (ordinal mRS) at 90 days. CTP core lesion volumes did not modify the treatment effect of near-complete recanalization on clinical outcome.

conclusionsCTP did not modify the effect of near-complete reperfusion on clinical outcomes. Thus, CTP cannot explain why some patients with near-complete reperfusion have poor clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeHospitalizationHumansReperfusionTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37620153
PMCPMC10494951
OpenAlexW4386126837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.