Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37620008›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2023

Causal effect of shifting from precarious to standard employment on all-cause mortality in Sweden: an emulation of a target trial.

Nuria Matilla-Santander, Anthony A Matthews, Virginia Gunn, Carles Muntaner, Bertina Kreshpaj, David H Wegman, Néstor Sánchez-Martínez, Julio C Hernando-Rodriguez, Maria Albin, Rebeka Balogh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Employment quality and mortality in Canada.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nuria Matilla-SantanderUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden nuria.matilla.santander@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-102X
Anthony A MatthewsUnit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Virginia GunnUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carles MuntanerBllomberg Faculty of Nursing, Division of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bertina KreshpajUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
David H WegmanPublic Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Néstor Sánchez-MartínezUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Julio C Hernando-RodriguezUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-667X
Maria AlbinUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rebeka BaloghInterface Demography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Letitia DavisResearcher, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Theo BodinUnit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed at estimating the causal effect of switching from precarious to standard employment on the 6-year and 12-year risk of all-cause mortality among workers aged 20-55 years in Sweden.

methodsWe emulated a series of 12 target trials starting every year between 2005 and 2016 using Swedish register data (n=251 273). We classified precariously employed individuals using a multidimensional approach at baseline as (1) remaining in precarious employment (PE) (73.8%) and (2) shifting to standard employment (26.2%). All-cause mortality was measured from 2006 to 2017. We pooled data for all 12 emulated trials and used covariate-adjusted pooled logistic regression to estimate intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects via risk ratios (RRs) and standardised risk curves (the parametric g-formula).

resultsShifting from precarious to standard employment decreases the 12-year risk of death by 20% on the relative scale (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73; 0.93), regardless of what happens after the initial shift. However, we estimated a 12-year risk reduction of 30% on the relative scale for workers shifting from precarious to standard employment and staying within this employment category for the full 12 years (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54; 0.95).

conclusionsThis study finds that shifting from low to higher-quality employment conditions (ie, stable employment, sufficient income levels and high coverage by collective agreements) decreases the risk of death. Remaining in PE increases the risk of premature mortality. Our results emphasise the necessity of ensuring decent work for the entire working population to accomplish the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Indexed as

EmploymentMortality, PrematureCausalityHumansLogistic ModelsSwedenEPIDEMIOLOGYLONGITUDINAL STUDIESMORTALITYOCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37620008
PMCPMC10579471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.