Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37619646›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2023

Parameters of prediction: Multidimensional characterization of top-down influence in visual perception.

Javier Ortiz-Tudela, Victoria I Nicholls, Alex Clarke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Schema-driven prediction effects on episodic memory across the lifespan.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Javier Ortiz-TudelaDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Spain.
Victoria I NichollsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Alex ClarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: ac584@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 211200Wellcome Trust 211200/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recent popularity of predictive processing models of brain function, the term prediction is often instantiated very differently across studies. These differences in definition can substantially change the type of cognitive or neural operation hypothesised and thus have critical implications for the corresponding behavioural and neural correlates during visual perception. Here, we propose a five-dimensional scheme to characterise different parameters of prediction. Namely, flow of information, mnemonic origin, specificity, complexity, and temporal precision. We describe these dimensions and provide examples of their application to previous work. Such a characterisation not only facilitates the integration of findings across studies, but also helps stimulate new research questions.

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaVisual PerceptionHumansMemoryExpectationsMemoryPredictionTop-downVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID37619646
PMCPMC7615211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.