ArticleThe oncologist2024
Combined RAF and MEK Inhibition to Treat Activated Non-V600 BRAF-Altered Advanced Cancers.
Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The safety and efficacy of binimetinib for lung cancer: a systematic review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Binimetinib and encorafenib for the treatment of advanced solid tumors with non-V600E BRAF mutations: results from the Phase II BEAVER trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Triple-Targeted Therapy With Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Osimertinib inJTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Unveiling a new SORBS2::BRAF fusion in papillary thyroid carcinoma: insights from molecular diagnostics.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Hepatic carcinosarcoma: a rare and aggressive case with unusual molecular signature!Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic vulnerabilities and pan-cancer landscape of BRAF class III mutations in epithelial solid tumors.BJC reports · 2024Article
- Tumor-Agnostic Genomic and Clinical Analysis of BRAF Fusions Identifies Actionable Targets.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- RAF and MEK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- 2,2'- Bipyridine Derivatives Exert Anticancer Effects by Inducing Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HepG2) Cells.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Article
- Clinical Response of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma with Class III BRAF G466V Missense Mutation to Dabrafenib and Trametinib: A Case Report.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancers with non-V600 BRAF-activating alterations have no matched therapy. Preclinical data suggest that these tumors depend on ERK signaling; however, clinical response to MEK/ERK inhibitors has overall been low. We hypothesized that a narrow therapeutic index, driven by ERK inhibition in healthy (wild-type) tissues, limits the efficacy of these inhibitors. As these mutants signal as activated dimers, we further hypothesized that RAF inhibitors given concurrently would improve the therapeutic index by opposing ERK inhibition in normal tissues and not activate ERK in the already activated tumor. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing cell lines and patient-derived xenografts, we evaluated the effect of RAF inhibition, alone and in combination with MEK/ERK inhibitors. We then undertook a phase I/II clinical trial of a higher dose of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with the RAF inhibitor encorafenib in patients with advanced cancer with activating non-V600 BRAF alterations.
resultsRAF inhibition led to modest inhibition of signaling and growth in activated non-V600 BRAF preclinical models and allowed higher dose of MEK/ERK inhibitors in vivo for more profound tumor regression. Fifteen patients received binimetinib 60 mg twice daily plus encorafenib 450 mg daily (6 gastrointestinal primaries, 6 genitourinary primaries, 3 melanoma, and 2 lung cancer; 7 BRAF mutations and 8 BRAF fusions). Treatment was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities. One patient had a confirmed partial response, 8 had stable disease, and 6 had radiographic or clinical progression as best response. On-treatment biopsies revealed incomplete ERK pathway inhibition.
conclusionCombined RAF and MEK inhibition does not sufficiently inhibit activated non-V600 BRAF-mutant tumors in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.