ArticlePloS one2023
Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan for previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in patients with breast cancer: systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning-based assessment of HER2-ultralow expression in breast cancer: a multi-center validation study across primary and metastatic lesions.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-low hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan as a second-line treatment for HER2-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluation of Treatment With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan for HER2-Low Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Previously Treated Patients.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic HER2-Low Breast Cancer Who Have Received Prior Chemotherapy.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Escalation and optimisation of primary breast cancer treatment with antibody-drug conjugates.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics and therapeutic direction of HER2 low-expression breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis and Future Prospects of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) and Trophoblast Cell-Surface Antigen 2 (Trop-2) Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer Treatment.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe clinical efficacy and safety profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) have been demonstrated in previously treated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low advanced breast cancer (BC). It is, however, necessary to evaluate the value of T-DXd considering both its clinical efficacy and its cost, given that it is high. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated HER2-low advanced BC.
methodsWe used a partitioned survival model that included three mutually exclusive health states. The patients in the model were identified based on their clinical characteristics and outcomes from the DESTINY-Breast04. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model's robustness. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. The measures included costs, life years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net health benefits (INHBs), and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs).
resultsThe ICERs of T-DXd vs. chemotherapy were $83,892/QALY, $82,808/QALY, and $93,358/QALY in all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2-positive (HER2+) advanced BC patients and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced BC patients, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the cost of T-DXd and hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also identified as key drivers. If the price of T-DXd decreased to $17.00/mg, $17.13/mg, and $14.07/mg, it would be cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY in all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2+ advanced BC patients and HER2- advanced BC patients, respectively. At a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY, the probability of T-DXd being cost-effective was 81.10%, 82.27%, and 73.78% compared to chemotherapy for all HER2-low advanced BC patients, HER2+ advanced BC patients and HER2- advanced BC patients, respectively. Most subgroups of patients with HER2+ disease had a cost-effectiveness probability of > 50%.
conclusionFrom a third-party payer's perspective in the United States, the findings of the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that, at the current price, T-DXd is a cost-effective alternative to chemotherapy for patients with prior HER2-low advanced BC, at WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.