ArticlePloS one2023
Temporal organization of stride-to-stride variations contradicts predictive models for sensorimotor control of footfalls during walking.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Same geometry, different dynamics: what uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis misses about motor control.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Wobble-Board Dynamics Identify Individual Signatures of Balance Control for Clinical Assessment.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Wobble-board dynamics as a scalable assay of long-latency reflex function in aging.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Wobble board instability enhances proactive postural control.Chaos, solitons, and fractals · 2025Article
- The illusion of internal models in biological movement.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Review
- Wobble Board Instability Enhances Compensatory CoP Responses to CoM Movement Across Timescales.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Angular distribution of fractal temporal correlations supports adaptive responses to wobble board instability.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Bouncing bones-ancient wisdom meets modern science in a new take on locomotion.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Postural control in gymnasts: anisotropic fractal scaling reveals proprioceptive reintegration in vestibular perturbation.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- NONAN GaitPrint: An IMU gait database of healthy young adults.Scientific data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking exhibits stride-to-stride variations. Given ongoing perturbations, these variations critically support continuous adaptations between the goal-directed organism and its surroundings. Here, we report that stride-to-stride variations during self-paced overground walking show cascade-like intermittency-stride intervals become uneven because stride intervals of different sizes interact and do not simply balance each other. Moreover, even when synchronizing footfalls with visual cues with variable timing of presentation, asynchrony in the timings of the cue and footfall shows cascade-like intermittency. This evidence conflicts with theories about the sensorimotor control of walking, according to which internal predictive models correct asynchrony in the timings of the cue and footfall from one stride to the next on crossing thresholds leading to the risk of falling. Hence, models of the sensorimotor control of walking must account for stride-to-stride variations beyond the constraints of threshold-dependent predictive internal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.