Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37616184›Full record

ArticleMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2023

Sepsis Program Activities in Acute Care Hospitals - National Healthcare Safety Network, United States, 2022.

Raymund B Dantes, Hemjot Kaur, Beth A Bouwkamp, Kathryn A Haass, Prachi Patel, Margaret A Dudeck, Arjun Srinivasan, Shelley S Magill, W Wyatt Wilson, Mary Whitaker and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The weekend effect in sepsis and septic shock: a 5-year US national study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Status of Sepsis Care in European Hospitals: Results from an International Cross-Sectional Survey.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Raymund B Dantes
Hemjot Kaur
Beth A Bouwkamp
Kathryn A Haass
Prachi Patel
Margaret A Dudeck
Arjun Srinivasan
Shelley S Magill
W Wyatt Wilson
Mary Whitaker
Nicole M Gladden
Elizabeth S McLaughlin
Jennifer K Horowitz
Patricia J Posa
Hallie C Prescott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, life-threatening organ dysfunction secondary to infection, contributes to at least 1.7 million adult hospitalizations and at least 350,000 deaths annually in the United States. Sepsis care is complex, requiring the coordination of multiple hospital departments and disciplines. Sepsis programs can coordinate these efforts to optimize patient outcomes. The 2022 National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) annual survey evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of sepsis programs in acute care hospitals. Among 5,221 hospitals, 3,787 (73%) reported having a committee that monitors and reviews sepsis care. Prevalence of these committees varied by hospital size, ranging from 53% among hospitals with 0-25 beds to 95% among hospitals with >500 beds. Fifty-five percent of all hospitals provided dedicated time (including assigned protected time or job description requirements) for leaders of these committees to manage a program and conduct daily activities, and 55% of committees reported involvement with antibiotic stewardship programs. These data highlight opportunities, particularly in smaller hospitals, to improve the care and outcomes of patients with sepsis in the United States by ensuring that all hospitals have sepsis programs with protected time for program leaders, engagement of medical specialists, and integration with antimicrobial stewardship programs. CDC's Hospital Sepsis Program Core Elements provides a guide to assist hospitals in developing and implementing effective sepsis programs that complement and facilitate the implementation of existing clinical guidelines and improve patient care. Future NHSN annual surveys will monitor uptake of these sepsis core elements.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesSepsisAdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Delivery of Health CareHospitalsHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37616184
PMCPMC10468219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.