Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37616039›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2023

Saliency-Enhanced Content-Based Image Retrieval for Diagnosis Support in Dermatology Consultation: Reader Study.

Mathias Gassner, Javier Barranco Garcia, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Fabio Bertoldo, Fabienne Fröhlich, Matthias Guckenberger, Silvia Haueis, Christin Pelzer, Mauricio Reyes, Patrick Schmithausen and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mathias Gassner *Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9940-5678
Javier Barranco Garcia *Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-6053
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-1522
Fabio BertoldoDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-9332
Fabienne FröhlichDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-6388
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-9071
Silvia HaueisDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-8071
Christin PelzerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0294-2160
Mauricio ReyesARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-9990
Patrick SchmithausenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-6748
Dario SimicDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-0993
Ramon StaegerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-9596
Fabio VerardiDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9263-8675
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-5916
Andreas AdelmannLaboratory for Scientific Computing and Modelling, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-7007
Ralph P BraunDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-8206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research studies have demonstrated that medical content image retrieval can play an important role by assisting dermatologists in skin lesion diagnosis. However, current state-of-the-art approaches have not been adopted in routine consultation, partly due to the lack of interpretability limiting trust by clinical users.

objectiveThis study developed a new image retrieval architecture for polarized or dermoscopic imaging guided by interpretable saliency maps. This approach provides better feature extraction, leading to better quantitative retrieval performance as well as providing interpretability for an eventual real-world implementation.

methodsContent-based image retrieval (CBIR) algorithms rely on the comparison of image features embedded by convolutional neural network (CNN) against a labeled data set. Saliency maps are computer vision-interpretable methods that highlight the most relevant regions for the prediction made by a neural network. By introducing a fine-tuning stage that includes saliency maps to guide feature extraction, the accuracy of image retrieval is optimized. We refer to this approach as saliency-enhanced CBIR (SE-CBIR). A reader study was designed at the University Hospital Zurich Dermatology Clinic to evaluate SE-CBIR's retrieval accuracy as well as the impact of the participant's confidence on the diagnosis.

resultsSE-CBIR improved the retrieval accuracy by 7% (77% vs 84%) when doing single-lesion retrieval against traditional CBIR. The reader study showed an overall increase in classification accuracy of 22% (62% vs 84%) when the participant is provided with SE-CBIR retrieved images. In addition, the overall confidence in the lesion's diagnosis increased by 24%. Finally, the use of SE-CBIR as a support tool helped the participants reduce the number of nonmelanoma lesions previously diagnosed as melanoma (overdiagnosis) by 53%.

conclusionsSE-CBIR presents better retrieval accuracy compared to traditional CBIR CNN-based approaches. Furthermore, we have shown how these support tools can help dermatologists and residents improve diagnosis accuracy and confidence. Additionally, by introducing interpretable methods, we should expect increased acceptance and use of these tools in routine consultation.

Indexed as

algorithmsconvolutional neural networkdeep learningdermatologydermoscopic imagesdermoscopydiagnosisimage retrievalmelanomasaliency mapsskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID37616039
PMCPMC10485719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.