Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37616036›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Preferences of University Students for a Psychological Intervention Designed to Improve Sleep: Focus Group Study.

Michelle Tadros, Sophie Li, Emily Upton, Jill Newby, Aliza Werner-Seidler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle TadrosThe Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-9989
Sophie LiThe Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-6911
Emily UptonThe Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-2591
Jill NewbyThe Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-9811
Aliza Werner-SeidlerThe Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6159
Black Dog Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany university students have difficulties with sleep; therefore, effective psychological treatments are needed. Most research on psychological treatments to improve sleep has been conducted with middle-aged and older adults, which means it is unclear whether existing psychological treatments are helpful for young adult university students.

objectiveThis study aimed to discover university student preferences for a psychological intervention to improve sleep quality.

methodsFocus groups were conducted over 3 stages to examine students' views regarding content, format, and session duration for a psychological intervention to improve sleep. A thematic analysis was conducted to analyze participant responses.

resultsIn total, 30 participants attended small focus group discussions. Three key themes were identified: (1) program development, (2) help-seeking, and (3) student sleep characteristics. Program development subthemes were program format, program content, and engagement facilitators. Help-seeking subthemes were when to seek help, where to access help, stigma, and barriers. Student sleep characteristics subthemes were factors disturbing sleep and consequences of poor sleep.

conclusionsStudents emphasized the need for a sleep intervention with an in-person and social component, individualized content, and ways to monitor their progress. Participants did not think there was a stigma associated with seeking help for sleep problems. Students identified the lack of routine in their lifestyle, academic workload, and the pressure of multiple demands as key contributors to sleep difficulties.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionSleepAgedFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adultcollegefocus grouphelp-seekinginsomniainterventionintervention designpolysomnographypost secondarypsychologicalpsychotherapysleepsleep difficultiessleep medicinestudentstudent needstreatmentuniversityuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID37616036
PMCPMC10485721
OpenAlexW4383900609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.