ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2024
Identification of Novel Genes and Pathways of Ovarian Cancer Using a Comprehensive Bioinformatic Framework.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of chronic inflammation and mitochondrial energy metabolism-associated predictive and therapeutic models for lung adenocarcinoma patients.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Genomic data mining reveals hub genes and lncRNAs as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decoding the hypoxia-exosome-immune triad in OSA: PRCP/UCHL1/BTG2-driven metabolic dysregulation revealed by interpretable machine learning.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Unravelling driver genes as potential therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer via integrated bioinformatics approach.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a significant contributor to gynecological cancer-related deaths worldwide, with a high mortality rate. Despite several advances in understanding the pathogenesis of OC, the molecular mechanisms underlying its development and prognosis remain poorly understood. Therefore, the current research study aimed to identify hub genes involved in the pathogenesis of OC that could serve as selective diagnostic and therapeutic targets. To achieve this, the dataset GEO2R was used to retrieve differentially expressed genes. The study identified a total of five genes (CDKN1A, DKK1, CYP1B1, NTS, and GDF15) that were differentially expressed in OC. Subsequently, a network analysis was performed using the STRING database, followed by the construction of a network using Cytoscape. The network analyzer tool in Cytoscape predicted 276 upregulated and 269 downregulated genes. Furthermore, KEGG analysis was conducted to identify different pathways related to OC. Subsequently, survival analysis was performed to validate gene expression alterations and predict hub genes, using a p-value of 0.05 as a threshold. Four genes (CDKN1A, DKK1, CYP1B1, and NTS) were predicted as significant hub genes, while one gene (GDF15) was predicted as non-significant. The adjusted P values of said predicted genes are 2.85E - 07, 5.49E - 06, 4.28E - 07, 1.43E - 07, and 3.70E - 07 for CDKN1A, DKK1, NTS, GDF15, and CYP1B1 respectively; additionally 6.08, 5.76, 5.74, 5.01, and 4.9 LogFc values of the said genes were predicted in GEO data set. In a boxplot analysis, the expression of these genes was analyzed in normal and tumor cells. The study found that three genes were highly expressed in tumor cells, while two genes (CDKN1A and DKK1) were more elevated in normal cells. According to the boxplot analysis for CDKN1A, 50% of tumor cells ranged between approx 3.8 and 5, while 50% of normal cells ranged between approx 6.9 and 7.9, which is greater than tumor cells. This shows that in normal cells, the CYP1B1 has a high expression level according to the GEPIA boxplot; addtionally the boxplot for DKK1 indicated that 50% of tumor cells ranged between approx 0 and 0.5, which was less than that of normal cells which ranged between approx 0.3 and 0.9. It shows that DKK1 is highly expressed in normal genes. Overall, the current study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying OC. The identified hub genes and drug candidate targets could potentially serve as alternative diagnostic and therapeutic options for OC patients. Further research is needed to investigate the clinical significance of these findings and develop effective interventions that can improve the prognosis of patients with OC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.