ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2023
Depicting and predicting changes of lung after lobectomy for cancer by using CT images.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lobectomy is an effective and well-established therapy for localized lung cancer. This study aimed to assess the lung and lobe change after lobectomy and predict the postoperative lung volume. The study included 135 lung cancer patients from two hospitals who underwent lobectomy (32, right upper lobectomy (RUL); 31, right middle lobectomy (RML); 24, right lower lobectomy (RLL); 26, left upper lobectomy (LUL); 22, left lower lobectomy (LLL)). We initially employ a convolutional neural network model (nnU-Net) for automatically segmenting pulmonary lobes. Subsequently, we assess the volume, effective lung volume (ELV), and attenuation distribution for each lobe as well as the entire lung, before and after lobectomy. Ultimately, we formulate a machine learning model, incorporating linear regression (LR) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) methods, to predict the postoperative lung volume. Due to the physiological compensation, the decreased TLV is about 10.73%, 8.12%, 13.46%, 11.47%, and 12.03% for the RUL, RML, RLL, LUL, and LLL, respectively. The attenuation distribution in each lobe changed little for all types of lobectomy. LR and MLP models achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 9.8% and 14.2%, respectively. Radiological findings and a predictive model of postoperative lung volume might help plan the lobectomy and improve the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.