Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615808›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2024

Feedback About a Person's Social Context - Personal Networks and Daily Social Interactions.

Marie Stadel, Gert Stulp, Anna M Langener, Timon Elmer, Marijtje A J van Duijn, Laura F Bringmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie StadelDepartment of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.stadel@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-7602
Gert StulpDepartment of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0173-5554
Anna M LangenerDepartment of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-0263
Timon ElmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4354-4457
Marijtje A J van DuijnDepartment of Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-3208
Laura F BringmannDepartment of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-9935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social context of a person, meaning their social relationships and daily social interactions, is an important factor for understanding their mental health. However, personalised feedback approaches to psychotherapy do not consider this factor sufficiently yet. Therefore, we developed an interactive feedback prototype focusing specifically on a person's social relationships as captured with personal social networks (PSN) and daily social interactions as captured with experience sampling methodology (ESM). We describe the development of the prototype as well as two evaluation studies: Semi-structured interviews with students (N = 23) and a focus group discussion with five psychotherapy patients. Participants from both studies considered the prototype useful. The students considered participation in our study, which included social context assessment via PSN and ESM as well as a feedback session, insightful. However, it remains unclear how much insight the feedback procedure generated for the students beyond the insights they already gained from the assessments. The focus group patients indicated that in a clinical context, (social context) feedback may be especially useful to generate insight for the clinician and facilitate collaboration between patient and clinician. Furthermore, it became clear that the current feedback prototype requires explanations by a researcher or trained clinician and cannot function as a stand-alone intervention. As such, we discuss our feedback prototype as a starting point for future research and clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsSocial InteractionAdultFeedbackFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapySocial NetworkingYoung AdultEgocentric networksExperience sampling methodology (ESM)Personalised feedbackPersonalised psychotherapySocial networks

Identifiers

PMID37615808
PMCPMC11196300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.