Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37615799›Full record

SynthesisBrain topography2024

EEG Microstates in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-analysis.

Alina Chivu, Simona A Pascal, Alena Damborská, Miralena I Tomescu

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain topography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alina ChivuCINETic Center, National University of Theatre and Film "I.L. Caragiale" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Simona A PascalFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Applied Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Alena DamborskáDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Miralena I TomescuCINETic Center, National University of Theatre and Film "I.L. Caragiale" Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania. miralena.tomescu@gmail.com.
University of Bucharest · ROCentral European Institute of Technology · CZTitu Maiorescu University · RO

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky FNBr 65269705Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii TE126/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reduce the psycho-social burden increasing attention has focused on brain abnormalities in the most prevalent and highly co-occurring neuropsychiatric disorders, such as mood and anxiety. However, high inter-study variability in these patients results in inconsistent and contradictory alterations in the fast temporal dynamics of large-scale networks as measured by EEG microstates. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we aim to investigate the consistency of these changes to better understand possible common neuro-dynamical mechanisms of these disorders.In the systematic search, twelve studies investigating EEG microstate changes in participants with mood and anxiety disorders and individuals with subclinical depression were included in this meta-analysis, adding up to 787 participants.The results suggest that EEG microstates consistently discriminate mood and anxiety impairments from the general population in patients and subclinical states. Specifically, we found a small significant effect size for B microstates in patients compared to healthy controls, with larger effect sizes for increased B presence in unmedicated patients with comorbidity. In a subgroup meta-analysis of ten mood disorder studies, microstate D showed a significant effect size for decreased presence. When investigating only the two anxiety disorder studies, we found a significantly small effect size for the increased microstate A and a medium effect size for decreased microstate E (one study). However, more studies are needed to elucidate whether these findings are diagnostic-specific markers.Results are discussed in relation to the functional meaning of microstates and possible contribution to an explanatory mechanism of overlapping symptomatology of mood and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersBrainElectroencephalographyMood DisordersHumansAnxietyBipolar DisorderDepressionMeta-AnalysisMicrostatesPanic DisorderPTSD

Identifiers

PMID37615799
PMCPMC11026263
OpenAlexW4386116493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.