ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Automated, fast, robust brain extraction on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI in presence of brain tumors: an optimized model based on multi-center datasets.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of acoustic neuroma: A systematic review.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Radiomic Applications in Skull Base Pathology: A Systematic Review of Potential Clinical Uses.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesExisting brain extraction models should be further optimized to provide more information for oncological analysis. We aimed to develop an nnU-Net-based deep learning model for automated brain extraction on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) images in presence of brain tumors.
methodsThis is a multi-center, retrospective study involving 920 patients. A total of 720 cases with four types of intracranial tumors from private institutions were collected and set as the training group and the internal test group. Mann-Whitney U test (U test) was used to investigate if the model performance was associated with pathological types and tumor characteristics. Then, the generalization of model was independently tested on public datasets consisting of 100 glioma and 100 vestibular schwannoma cases.
resultsIn the internal test, the model achieved promising performance with median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.989 (interquartile range (IQR), 0.988-0.991), and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 6.403 mm (IQR, 5.099-8.426 mm). U test suggested a slightly descending performance in meningioma and vestibular schwannoma group. The results of U test also suggested that there was a significant difference in peritumoral edema group, with median DSC of 0.990 (IQR, 0.989-0.991, p = 0.002), and median HD of 5.916 mm (IQR, 5.000-8.000 mm, p = 0.049). In the external test, our model also showed to be robust performance, with median DSC of 0.991 (IQR, 0.983-0.998) and HD of 8.972 mm (IQR, 6.164-13.710 mm).
conclusionsFor automated processing of MRI neuroimaging data presence of brain tumors, the proposed model can perform brain extraction including important superficial structures for oncological analysis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed model serves as a radiological tool for image preprocessing in tumor cases, focusing on superficial brain structures, which could streamline the workflow and enhance the efficiency of subsequent radiological assessments. KEY POINTS: • The nnU-Net-based model is capable of segmenting significant superficial structures in brain extraction. • The proposed model showed feasible performance, regardless of pathological types or tumor characteristics. • The model showed generalization in the public datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.